Measurement of pressure coefficient of melt viscosity: drag flow versus capillary flow |
| |
Authors: | Hee Eon Park Sung Taek Lim Hans Martin Laun John M. Dealy |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Chemical Engineering, McGill University, 3610 University Street, Montreal, H3A 2B2, Canada;(2) Polymer Research, BASF Aktiengesellschaft, Ludwigshafen, Germany;(3) Present address: Central R&D Institute, Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., 314 Maetan 3, Yeongtong, Suwon, 443-743, Korea |
| |
Abstract: | The pressure coefficient of viscosity of poly(α-methylstyrene-co-acrylonitrile) was measured using a high-pressure sliding plate rheometer (HPSPR) and two types of capillary rheometer: a piston-driven device with a throttle at the exit [piston capillary rheometer with throttle (PCRWT)] operated at a fixed flow rate, and a counter-pressure nitrogen capillary rheometer (CPNCR) operated at a fixed pressure drop. In the HPSPR, the pressure, shear rate, density, and viscosity are all uniform throughout the sample, while the analysis of capillary data is complicated by the axial pressure gradient and the radial shear rate gradient. The polymer was found to be piezorheologically simple, and the HPSPR data indicated that the pressure coefficient of viscosity β ≡ dln(a P)/dP decreased slightly with increasing pressure at high pressure. While β from PCRWT data from different laboratories and instruments agreed fairly well, the β values were on average about 2/3 of that from the HPSPR. The CPNCR yields β about 18% lower than that of the HPSPR. |
| |
Keywords: | Pα MSAN Polymer melt Viscosity Pressure coefficient Capillary rheometer Sliding plate rheometer PVT data Piston capillary rheometer with throttle Counter-pressure nitrogen capillary rheometer |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|