A Blind-Spot Argument Against Dispositionalist Accounts of Belief |
| |
Authors: | Davide Fassio |
| |
Institution: | 1. Department of Philosophy, University of Geneva, 2 Rue de Candolle CH-1211, Geneva, Switzerland
|
| |
Abstract: | Dispositionalist accounts of belief define beliefs in terms of specific sets of dispositions. In this article, I provide a blind-spot argument against these accounts. The core idea of the argument is that beliefs having the form p and it is not manifestly believed that p] cannot be manifestly believed. This means that one cannot manifest such beliefs in one’s assertions, conscious thoughts, actions, behaviours, or any other type of activity. However, if beliefs are sets of dispositions, they must be manifestable in some way. Therefore, according to my argument, beliefs are not sets of dispositions. The argument is defended against some possible objections. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|