Determination of Aroma Compounds from Alcoholic Beverages in Spiked Blood Samples by Means of Dynamic Headspace GC–MS |
| |
Authors: | Katja Schulz R Klaus Mueller Werner Engewald Adelgunde Graefe Jan Dreßler |
| |
Institution: | 1. Institute of Legal Medicine, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus of Dresden Technical University, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany 2. Institute of Doping Analysis and Sports Biochemistry, Dresdner Str. 12, 01731, Kreischa, Germany 3. Institute of Analytical Chemistry, University of Leipzig, Linnestr. 3, 04103, Leipzig, Germany 4. Institute of Legal Medicine, University of Leipzig, Johannisallee 28, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
|
| |
Abstract: | Some aroma compounds found in alcoholic beverages are characteristic of a certain beverage (i.e. 2,4-decadienoic acid ethyl ester is characteristic of pear spirit and 5-butyltetrahydro-4-methylfuran-2-on “whiskey lactone” is characteristic of aged spirits like whiskey). These substances were detectable in beverages but not in blood samples. The aim of this investigation was to find a sensitive sampling technique for aroma compounds in whole blood samples. This technique may be used in forensic toxicology for examination of drinking claims. The method comprises dynamic headspace sampling using a purge and trap concentrator, followed by quantitative gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (dynamic HS–GC–MS). The influence of sample preparation, trap adsorbents and sample temperature as well as desorption time and purge time on the quality of the analytical results were investigated. The following optimal parameters were determined: stirred and diluted whole blood sample without salt addition, use of Carbotrap C as trap material, sample temperature at 80 °C, desorption time 20 min and purge time 30 min. These optimal parameters were used for the determination of detection limits (LOD). The LOD of aroma compounds by means of dynamic headspace sampling were compared with the results of conventional sampling: the static headspace technique. Limits of detection for the aroma compounds with conventional static headspace GC are in the range 400–10,000 μg L?1. Dynamic headspace–GC was found to be a more sensitive sampling technique for most of the aroma compounds investigated (e.g. C4–C8 ethyl esters, benzoic acid ethyl ester, linalool oxide and 4-ethylguaiacol) with detection limits between 1 and 50 μg L?1, but there were also limits to the sampling of substances with lower volatility like decanoic acid ethyl ester, 2,4-decadienoic acid ethyl ester, eugenol and whiskey lactone with detection limits of about 1,000 μg L?1. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|