Evaluation of Several Molybdenum and Ruthenium Catalysts for the Metathesis Homocoupling of 3‐Methyl‐1‐Butene

We synthesized Mo(NC ₆F₅)(CHCM e₂Ph)(TPPO )(PP hMe₂)Cl (TPPO = 2,3,5,6‐tetraphenylphenoxide), Mo(NC ₆F₅)(CHCM e₂Ph)(TTBTO )(PP hMe₂)Cl (TTBTO = 2,6‐di(3′,5′‐di‐tert‐butylphenyl)phenoxide), and Mo(NC ₆F₅)(CHCM e₂Ph)(TPPO )(PP hMe₂)(CF ₃Pyr) (CF ₃Pyr = 3,4‐bistrifluoromethylpyrrolide), in order to evaluate them as catalysts for the homocoupling of 3‐methyl‐1‐butene. They were compared with Mo(NC ₆F₅)(CHCM e₂Ph)(HMTO )(PP hMe₂)Cl (HMTO = 2,6‐dimesitylphenoxide), Mo(NC ₆F₅)(CHCM e₂Ph)(HIPTO )(PP hMe₂)Cl (HIPTO = 2,6‐di(2′,4′,6′‐triisopropylphenyl)phenoxide), and several other Mo and Ru catalysts. In the best cases turnover numbers (TON s) of 400 – 700 were observed for the homocoupling of 3‐methyl‐1‐butene in a closed vessel (ethylene not removed).