| Abstract: | In this study, electromembrane extraction from a flowing sample solution, termed as continuous‐flow electromembrane extraction, was developed and compared with conventional procedures for the determination of four basic drugs in real samples. Experimental parameters affecting the extraction efficiency were further studied and optimized. Under optimum conditions, linearity of continuous‐flow procedure was within 8.0–500 ng/mL, while it was wider for conventional procedures (2.0–500 ng/mL). Moreover, repeatability (percentage relative standard deviation) was found to range between 5.6 and 10.4% (n = 3) for the continuous‐flow procedure, with a better repeatability than that of conventional procedures (2.3–5.5% (n = 3)). Also, for the continuous‐flow procedure, the estimated detection limit (signal‐to‐noise ratio = 3) was less than 2.4 ng/mL and extraction recoveries were within 8–10%, while the corresponding figures for conventional procedures were less than 0.6 ng/mL and 42–60%, respectively. Thus, the results showed that both continuous flow and conventional procedures were applicable for the extraction of model compounds. However, the conventional procedure was more convenient to use, and thus it was applied to determine sample drugs in real urine and wastewater samples. |
