习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想学理化研究论纲

加强对习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想的学理化研究具有重大理论和现实意义。开展学理化研究，一方面是要坚持以习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想为指导，加快推动学科体系、学术体系和话语体系建设，推动构建中国特色哲学社会科学；另一方面，学理化研究可以增强对新思想的学科体系、学术体系和话语体系的有力支撑，使新思想进一步彰显其内在的学理性、创新性和整体性，从而全面系统揭示习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想的时代性、科学性和真理性，以及彰显当代中国马克思主义理论的优秀品质和学风文风。开展学理化研究，要紧扣习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想这一根本性主题和主线，聚焦并挖掘新思想对马克思主义理论的原创性贡献，更好体现新思想的理论创新性、价值创造性以及实践指导性。推动学理化研究，需要处理好学理化研究与党的理论宣传和贯彻落实以及与思想性和工具性、实践性和理论性、学术话语和政策话语、本土化和国际化、学理化和大众化等之间的内在关系。

An Outline of the Theoretical Study about Xi Jinping Thought of New Era Socialism with Chinese Characteristics

It is of vital significance of theory and practice to enhance the theoretical study on Xi Jinping thought of new era socialism with Chinese characteristics. In order to engage in theoretical study, it is, on one hand, to insist on the guidance of Xi Jinping thought of new era socialism with Chinese characteristics accelerate the building of faculty system, scholastic system and discourse system, and to promote the construction of philosophical-social sciences with Chinese characteristics, and, on the other hand, the theoretical study can enhance supporting the faculty system, scholastic system and discourse system of New Thought, to further display the theoretical and originate nature in the New Thought, thus to wholly and systematically expose Xi Jinping thought of new era socialism with Chinese characteristics in the realms of time, science, truth, and manifest the quality and style of Marxism in comtemporary China. For theoretical study, it is necessary to stick to the fundamental theme and principle line of Xi Jinping thought of new era socialism with Chinese characteristics, to focus on exploring the New Thought’s contribution of originality to Marxist theory, so as to embody the New Thought’s theoretical innovation, value creation and practical guidance. For promoting theoretical study, it is necessary to settle the inner relationships between theoretical study and the theoretical publicity and implementing of the Party, between ideological content and instrumental nature, between praxis and theory, between scholastic discourse and policy discourse, between native practice and international practice, and between theoretical nature and popularization.