| Institution: | 1. Institute of Advanced Synthesis, School of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Jiangsu National Synergetic Innovation Center for, Advanced Materials, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, 211816 China
Fachbereich Chemie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Hans-Meerwein-Straße, 35032 Marburg, Germany;2. Fachbereich Chemie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Hans-Meerwein-Straße, 35032 Marburg, Germany;3. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, 76019 USA;4. Institute of Advanced Synthesis, School of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Jiangsu National Synergetic Innovation Center for, Advanced Materials, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, 211816 China |
| Abstract: | Syntheses of the copper and gold complexes Cu{Fe(CO)5}2]SbF6] and Au{Fe(CO)5}2]HOB{3,5-(CF3)2C6H3}3] containing the homoleptic carbonyl cations M{Fe(CO)5}2]+ (M=Cu, Au) are reported. Structural data of the rare, trimetallic Cu2Fe, Ag2Fe and Au2Fe complexes Cu{Fe(CO)5}2]SbF6], Ag{Fe(CO)5}2]SbF6] and Au{Fe(CO)5}2]HOB{3,5-(CF3)2C6H3}3] are also given. The silver and gold cations M{Fe(CO)5}2]+ (M=Ag, Au) possess a nearly linear Fe-M-Fe’ moiety but the Fe-Cu-Fe’ in Cu{Fe(CO)5}2]SbF6] exhibits a significant bending angle of 147° due to the strong interaction with the SbF6]? anion. The Fe(CO)5 ligands adopt a distorted square-pyramidal geometry in the cations M{Fe(CO)5}2]+, with the basal CO groups inclined towards M. The geometry optimization with DFT methods of the cations M{Fe(CO)5}2]+ (M=Cu, Ag, Au) gives equilibrium structures with linear Fe-M-Fe’ fragments and D2 symmetry for the copper and silver cations and D4d symmetry for the gold cation. There is nearly free rotation of the Fe(CO)5 ligands around the Fe-M-Fe’ axis. The calculated bond dissociation energies for the loss of both Fe(CO)5 ligands from the cations M{Fe(CO)5}2]+ show the order M=Au (De=137.2 kcal mol?1)>Cu (De=109.0 kcal mol?1)>Ag (De=92.4 kcal mol?1). The QTAIM analysis shows bond paths and bond critical points for the M?Fe linkage but not between M and the CO ligands. The EDA-NOCV calculations suggest that the Fe(CO)5]→M+←Fe(CO)5] donation is significantly stronger than the Fe(CO)5]←M+→Fe(CO)5] backdonation. Inspection of the pairwise orbital interactions identifies four contributions for the charge donation of the Fe(CO)5 ligands into the vacant (n)s and (n)p AOs of M+ and five components for the backdonation from the occupied (n-1)d AOs of M+ into vacant ligand orbitals. |
