On the (im)possibility of evaluating correct individual rate constants of chain propagation kp and chain termination kt by combining kp2/kt and kp/kt data for chain‐length dependent termination

On the basis of simulated data two ways of evaluating individual rate constants by combining k_p²/k_t and k_p /k_t (k_p , k_t = rate constants of chain propagation and termination, respectively) were checked considering the chain‐length dependence of k_t. The first way tried to make use of the fact that pseudostationary polymerization yields data for k_p²/k_t as well as for k_p /k_t referring to the very same experiment, in the second way k_p²/k_t (from steady state experiments) and k_p/k_t data referring to the same mean length of the terminating radical chains were compared. In the first case no meaningful data at all could be obtained because different averages of k_t are operative in the expressions for k_p /k_t and k_p²/k_t. In spite of the comparatively small difference between these two averages (≈15% only) this makes the method collapse. The second way, which can be regarded as an intelligent modification of the “classical” method of determining individual rate constants, at least succeeded in reproducing the correct order of magnitude of the individual rate constants. However, although stationary and pseudostationary experiments independently could be shown to return the same k_t for the same average chain‐length of terminating radicals within extremely narrow limits no reasonable chain‐length dependence of k_t could be derived in this way. The reason is an extreme sensitivity of the pair of equations for k_p/k_t and k_p²/k_t towards small errors and inconsistencies which renders the method unsuccessful even for the high quality simulation data and most probably makes it even collapse for real data. This casts a characteristic light on the unsatisfactory situation with respect to individual rate constants determined in the classical way, regardless of a chain‐length dependence of termination. As a consequence, all efforts of establishing the chain‐length dependence of k_t are recommended to avoid this way and should rather resort to methods based on inserting a directly determined k_p into the equations characteristic of k_p²/k_t or k_p/k_t, properly considering the chain‐length dependent character of k_t.