首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Differences between the internal energy depositions induced by collisional activation and by electron transfer of W(CO)6(2+) ions on collision with Ar and K targets
Authors:Hayakawa Shigeo  Kitaguchi Akihiro  Kameoka Satoko  Toyoda Michisato  Ichihara Toshio
Affiliation:Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Osaka Prefecture University, 1-1 Gakuencho, Nakaku, Sakai, Osaka 599-8531, Japan. hayakawa@c.s.osakafu-u.ac.jp
Abstract:Doubly charged tungsten hexacarbonyl W(CO)(6) (2+) ions were made to collide with Ar and K targets to give singly and doubly charged positive ions by collision-induced dissociation (CID). The resulting ions were analyzed and detected by using a spherical electrostatic analyzer. Whereas the doubly charged fragment ions resulting from collisional activation (CA) were dominant with the Ar target, singly charged fragment ions resulting from electron transfer were dominant with the K target. The internal energy deposition in collisionally activated dissociation (CAD) evaluated with the Ar target was broad and decreased with increasing internal energy. The predominant peaks observed with the K target were associated with singly charged W(CO)(2) (+) and W(CO)(3) (+) ions: these ions were not the result of CA, but arose from dissociation induced by electron transfer (DIET). The internal energy deposition resulting from the electron transfer was very narrow and centered at a particular energy, 7.8 eV below the energy level of the W(CO)(6) (2+) ion. This narrow internal energy distribution was explained in terms of electron transfer by Landau-Zener potential crossing at a separation of 5.9 x 10(-8) cm between a W(CO)(6) (2+) ion and a K atom, and the coulombic repulsion between singly charged ions in the exit channel. A large cross section of 1.1 x 10(-14) cm(2) was estimated for electron capture of the doubly charged W(CO)(6) (2+) ion from the alkali metal target, whose ionization energy is very low. The term "collision-induced dissociation," taken literally, includes all dissociation processes induced by collision, and therefore encompasses both CAD and DIET processes in the present work. Although the terms CID and CAD have been defined similarly, we would like to propose that they should not be used interchangeably, on the basis that there are differences in the observed ions and in their intensities with Ar and K targets.
Keywords:
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号