首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

复杂设计下类均值复制与类加权均值复制的比较(英文)
引用本文:杨宝慧,孙山泽.复杂设计下类均值复制与类加权均值复制的比较(英文)[J].应用概率统计,2002,18(3):225-229.
作者姓名:杨宝慧  孙山泽
作者单位:北京大学数学学院,北京,100871
基金项目:Supported by National Natural Foundation of China(10071091).
摘    要:复制数据是处理抽样调查中数据项目缺失的一种常用方法。在两种常见模型及复杂抽样设计下,本文对处理数据项目缺失的类均值复制和类加权均值复制方法进行了对比。

关 键 词:下类均值复制  类加权均值复制  项目缺失  单元缺失  一致回答机制  模型推断  抽样调查  数据复制

Comparison of Class Mean Imputation and Weighted Class Mean Imputation under Complex Survey Design
BAOHUI YANG,SHANZE SUN.Comparison of Class Mean Imputation and Weighted Class Mean Imputation under Complex Survey Design[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Probability and Statisties,2002,18(3):225-229.
Authors:BAOHUI YANG  SHANZE SUN
Abstract:Unit non-response and item non-response are the two types of non-response in surveys. Imputation, a process in which values are assigned for missing responses, is typically employed to compensate for item missing data. Under complex survey design, weighted class mean is usually used as the imputed value. This paper compares three estimators related to class mean imputation and weighted class mean imputation under two models: equal expectation, equal and unequal variance within each class respectively. The conclusion is: For the equal variance model, the simple class mean estimator is the best, the class mean imputation estimator is the second and the weighted class mean imputation estimator is the worst. Under the specified unequal variance model, and the specified survey design, for large sample, the weighted class mean imputation estimator is better than class mean imputation estimator, which is better than the simple class mean estimator.
Keywords:Item non-response  uniform response mechanism  model based inference  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号