Combined use of adiabatic calorimetry and heat conduction calorimetry for quantifying propellant cook-off hazards

Recent work performed at DERA (now QinetiQ) has shown how accelerating rate calorimetry (ARC) can be used to obtain time to maximum rate curves using larger samples of energetic materials. The use of larger samples reduces the influence of thermal inertia, permitting experimental data to be gathered at temperatures closer to those likely to be encountered during manufacture, transportation or storage of an explosive device. However, in many cases, extrapolation of the time to maximum rate curve will still be necessary. Because of its low detection limit compared to the ARC, heat conduction calorimetry can be used to obtain data points at, or below, the region where an explosive system might exceed its temperature of no return and undergo a thermal explosion.Paired ARC and heat conduction calorimetry experiments have been conducted on some energetic material samples to explore this possibility further. Examples of where both agreement and disagreement are found between the two techniques are reported and the significance of these discussed. Ways in which combining ARC and heat conduction calorimetry experiments can enhance, complement and validate the results obtained from each technique are examined.