SIMPLE EXPLANATION OF THE MISSES IN THE COOPERATION OF CHARGES IN PHOTOSYNTHETIC O2 EVOLUTION

Abstract —In the model of Forbush et at. (1971) the observed damping of the flash yield sequence of photosynthetic O₂ evolution was related to a certain percentage of ‘misses’ (α; i.e. centers not converted). The possibility of a miss was supposed to be equal for all states S_0.1,2,3. We propose a new model and a new recurrence law that gives better quantitative agreement with the O₂ yield oscillations observed in Chlorella during a sequence of flashes. We find a better fit with all experimental results by assuming very unequal misses; the misses occur nearly exclusively on S₂ (and also sometimes on S₃). In the simpler case of only one miss on one state, half of S₂ exists as an inactive form S₂₊^- because it is in apparent equilibrium with pool A. The active form of S₂ is converted to S₃ in a flash and the unchanged inactive form S₂₊^- explains the miss: S ₁ hv→S₂₊^-=S₂hv→S₃ (S₂₊^- is a transition state between S₁ to S₂ associated with Q^-). In the dark, the apparent equilibrium constant K_A between pool A and Q (i.e. S₀, S₁ in the dark) is very large; this explains why there is no miss on these states. In light, the experimental value of K_A between pool A and Q (i.e. S₂, S₃ in the light) is 1, and this explains why the misses are large for states S₂, S₃; i.e., S₂₊^-/S2- 1 and sometimes S₃₊^-/S₃?0–1. This new model predicts that the total number of active states ΣS_i=S₀+S₁+S₂+S₃ is an oscillating function of the flash number. This sum 2S, is also the number of trapping centers for excitons. As fluorescence is proportional to excitons that are not trapped, our model explains why the fluorescence oscillates as a function of the flash number. We find also that the initial rates of O₂ evolution after (n - 1) flashes vs the 02 yield of the n^th flash are not exactly on a straight line, which also favors our model.