Comparison of passive and active sampling methods for the determination of nitrogen dioxide in urban air

Three different methods for sampling and determination of nitrogen dioxide in urban air are compared: an NO/NO_x-monitor and an active (pumped) and a passive sampling method. For the latter two methods, sodium iodide is used as absorbent. For weekly averages the results from the passive sampler are within 10–20% of the results for the two other methods in the concentration range 15–30 μg NO₂/m³. The detection limit for the passive sampler is 1 μg NO₂/m³ (7 days), the precision is 5% and the accuracy is estimated to 20%. The active iodide method agrees very well with the NO/NO_x-monitor. Compared on 24 h basis for a period of 3 months, covering a concentration range of 5–45 μg NO₂/m³, the deviation between the two methods is within 5%, and the absorption capacity of the iodide reagent is excellent as the breakthrough is below 1%.