The Contextuality Loophole is Fatal for the Derivation of Bell Inequalities: Reply to a Comment by I. Schmelzer |
| |
Authors: | Theodorus M. Nieuwenhuizen Marian Kupczynski |
| |
Affiliation: | 1.Institute for Theoretical Physics,Amsterdam,The Netherlands;2.International Institute of Physics,Natal,Brazil;3.Département de l’ Informatique,Université du Québec en Outaouais (UQO),Gatineau,Canada |
| |
Abstract: | Ilya Schmelzer wrote recently: Nieuwenhuizen argued that there exists some “contextuality loophole” in Bell’s theorem. This claim in unjustified. It is made clear that this arose from attaching a meaning to the title and the content of the paper different from the one intended by Nieuwenhuizen. “Contextual loophole” means only that if the supplementary parameters describing measuring instruments are correctly introduced, Bell and Bell-type inequalities may not be proven. It is also stressed that a hidden variable model suffers from a “contextuality loophole” if it tries to describe different sets of incompatible experiments using a unique probability space and a unique joint probability distribution. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|