首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Operationalizing technology improvements in product development decision-making
Institution:1. Technology Management Area, INSEAD, Blvd. de Constance, 77305 Fontainebleau, France;2. Department of Management, CBA 4.202, Graduate School of Business, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA;3. Department of Marketing, CBA 7.202, Graduate School of Business, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA;1. Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, United States;2. Department of Psychology, University of Maine, Maine Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, United States;3. VA San Diego Healthcare System, University of California, San Diego, United States;4. Department of Psychology, University of Texas, Austin, United States;1. Telecom ParisTech, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, and CREST-LEI, Paris, France;2. Direzione Analisi dei mercati, concorrenza e studi, Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni, Centro Direzionale, Isola B5, 80143 Napoli, Italy;3. Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche ed Aziendali “M. Fanno”, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy;1. Department of Automation, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China;2. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
Abstract:Achieving competitive advantage and price premiums in many technology-based markets requires the incorporation of current technology in new products. To do so, firms in hyper-competitive environments increasingly plan and design their products concurrent with the independent development and validation of underlying technologies. Simultaneous validation of a core technology has important implications for a company’s product positioning and launch sequence decisions making these traditional marketing decisions relevant to operations managers. Prior research has shown that to minimize cannibalization in the absence of such improvements in technology, a firm should not launch low-end products before high-end products. However, concurrent evolution of technology can make it desirable and even necessary to introduce low-end products before high-end products. This is because in technology-based industries, improvements in technology delay the introduction of a high-end product, and a firm must trade-off the benefit of launching the low-end product earlier (greater discounted profits) against the cost of cannibalization of high-end product sales. High-end product cannibalization can be further reduced by offering the customer an option to upgrade from the low-end to high-end product, with important implications for the firm’s product positioning and introduction sequence decisions. Based on our study in the high technology industry, we model the product positioning and introduction sequence decisions under the simultaneous evolution of technology. Our analysis indicates that it may be optimal in a variety of circumstances for a firm to launch products in an increasing order of performance, even in the absence of network externalities. Besides presenting analytical results for product positioning and profit from different introduction sequences, the paper also makes a contribution to managerial practice by providing insights in the form of a conceptual framework.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号