Nonlinear viscoelasticity of polystyrene solutions. I. Strain-dependent relaxation modulus

Strain-dependent relaxation moduli G(t,s) were measured for polystyrene solutions in diethyl phthalate with a relaxometer of the cone-and-plate type. Ranges of molecular weight M and concentration c were from 1.23 × 10⁶ to 7.62 × 10⁶ and 0.112 to 0.329 g/cm³. Measurements were performed at various magnitudes of shear s ranging from 0.055 to 27.2. The relaxation modulus G(t,s) always decreased with increasing s and the relative amount of decrease (i.e.,–logG(t,s)/G(t,0)]) increased as t increased. However, the detailed strain dependences of G(t,s) could be classified into two types according to the M and c of the solution. When cM < 10⁶, the plot of log G(t,s) versus log t varied from a convex curve to an S-shaped curve with increasing s. For solutions of cM > 10⁶, the curves were still convex and S-shaped at very small and large s, respectively, but in a certain range of s (approximately 3 < s < 7) log G(t,s) decreased rapidly at short times and then very slowly; a peculiar inflection and a plateau appeared on the plot of log G(t,s) versus log t. The strain-dependent relaxation spectrum exhibited a trough at times corresponding to the plateau of log G(t,s). The longest relaxation time τ₁(s) and the corresponding relaxation strength G₁(s) were evaluated through the “Procedure X” of Tobolsky and Murakami. The relaxation time τ₁(s) was independent of s for all the solutions studied while G₁(s) decreased with s. The reduced relaxation strength G₁(s)/G₁(0) was a simple function of s (The plot of log G₁(s)/G₁(0) against log s was a convex curve) and was approximately independent of M and c in the range of cM <10⁶. This behavior of G₁(s)/G₁(0) was in agreement with that observed for a polyisobutylene solution and seems to have wide applicability to many polymeric systems. On the other hand, log G₁(s)/G₁(0) as a function of log s decreased in two steps and decreased more rapidly when M or c was higher. It was suggested that in the range of cM < 10⁶, a kind of geometrical factor might be responsible for a large part of the nonlinear behavior, while in the range of cM > 10⁶, some “intrinsic” nonlinearity of the entanglement network system might be important.