Determination of zinc in geological samples using Compton suppression with thermal and epithermal instrumental neutron activation analysis

The determination of Zn in geological samples using instrumental neutron activation analysis is usually done using the ⁶⁴Zn(n,γ)⁶⁵Zn reaction and its 244 day half-life. However this analysis has proven to be potentially difficult. This is due to its relatively low neutron absorption cross section and gamma ray intensity, and the relatively high neutron absorption cross section and gamma intensity of ⁴⁶Sc, which has an energy peak that is only 5 keV greater than ⁶⁵Zn. The use of a high resolution detector makes it possible to differentiate between the ⁶⁵Zn and ⁴⁶Sc photopeaks peaks. However, the dominating ⁴⁶Sc gamma ray can even make peak fitting routines unsuccessful in the proper determination of ⁶⁵Zn. The use of a Compton suppression system suppresses the ⁴⁶Sc peak, which has two coincident gamma-rays, and this greatly improves the ratio of the height of the ⁴⁶Sc 1120.5 keV photopeak to the ⁶⁵Zn 1115.4 keV photopeak. Irradiating the sample with epithermal neutrons also improves the measurement since ⁶⁵Zn has a higher cross section for epithermal neutrons rather than thermal neutrons, whereas ⁴⁶Sc has a higher thermal cross section. Another technique to determine zinc is the use of ⁶⁸Zn(n,γ)^69mZn reaction with its 13 h half-life using epithermal neutrons and Compton suppression INAA. However, the 438 keV gamma ray of ^69mZn has no interference with any adjoining photopeak. A critical comparison of these two methods is given.