Synthesis,Structures, and Some Reactions of [(Thioacyl)thio]‐ and (Acylseleno)antimony and ‐bismuth Derivatives ((RCSS)xMR$\rm{_{{\bf 3 - }{\bf x}}^{\bf 1} }$ and (RCOSe)xMR$\rm{_{{\bf 3 - }{\bf x}}^{\bf 1} }$ with M = Sb,Bi and x = 1–3)

A series of (thioacyl)thio]‐ and (acylseleno)antimony and (thioacyl)thio]‐ and (acylseleno)bismuth, i.e., (RCSS)_xMR and (RCOSe)_xMR (M = Sb, Bi, R¹ = aryl, x = 1–3), were synthesized in moderate to good yields by treating piperidinium or sodium carbodithioates and ‐selenoates with antimony and bismuth halides. Crystal structures of (4‐MeC₆H₄CSS)₂Sb(4‐MeC₆H₄) ( 9b′ ), (4‐MeOC₆H₄COSe)₂Sb(4‐MeC₆H₄) ( 12c′ ), (4‐MeOC₆H₄COS)₂Bi(4‐MeC₆H₄) ( 15c′ ), and (4‐MeOC₆H₄CSS)₂BiPh ( 18c ) along with (4‐MeC₆H₄COS)₂SbPh ( 6b ) and (4‐MeC₆H₄COS)₃Sb ( 7b ) were determined (Figs. 1 and 2). These compounds have a distorted square pyramidal structure, where the aryl or carbothioato (= acylthio) ligand at the central Sb‐ or Bi‐atom is perpendicular to the plane that includes the two carbodithioato (= (thioacyl)thio), carboselenato (= acylseleno), or carbothioato ligand and exist as an enantiomorph pair. Despite the large atomic radii, the C?S ??? Sb distances in (RCSS)₂MR¹ (M = As, Sb, Bi; R¹ = aryl) and the C?O ??? Sb distances in (RCOS)_xMR (M = As, Sb, Bi; x = 2, 3) are comparable to or shorter than those of the corresponding arsenic derivatives (Tables 2 and 3). A molecular‐orbital calculation performed on the model compounds (MeC(E)E¹)_3?xMMe_x (M = As, Sb, Bi; E = O, S; E¹ = S, Se; x = 1, 2) at the RHF/LANL2DZ level supported this shortening of C?E ??? Sb distances (Table 4). Natural‐bond‐orbital (NBO) analyses of the model compounds also revealed that two types of orbital interactions n_S → σ and n_S → σ play a role in the (thioacyl)thio derivatives (MeCSS)_3?xMMe_x (x = 1, 2) (Table 5). In the acylthio‐MeCOSMMe₂ (M = As, Sb, Bi), n_O → σ contributes predominantly to the orbital interactions, but in MeCOSeSbMe₂, none of n_O → σ and n_O → σ contributes to the orbital interactions. The n_S → σ and n_S → σ orbital interactions in the (thioacyl)thio derivatives are greater than those of n_O → σ and n_O → σ in the acylthio and acylseleno derivatives (MeCOE)_3?xMMe_x (E = S, Se; M = As, Sb, Bi; x = 1, 2). ?The reactions of RCOSeSbPh₂ (R = 4‐MeC₆H₄) with piperidine led to the formation of piperidinium diphenylselenoxoantimonate(1?) (= piperidinium diphenylstibinoselenoite) (H₂NC₅H₁₀)⁺Ph₂SbSe^?, along with the corresponding N‐acylpiperidine (Table 6). Similar reactions of the bis‐derivatives (RCOSe)₂SbR¹ (R, R¹ = 4‐MeC₆H₄) with piperidine gave the novel di(piperidinium) phenyldiselenoxoantimonate(2?) (= di(piperidinium) phenylstibonodiselenoite), (H₂NC₅H₁₀)⁺]₂(PhSbSe₂)^2?, in which the negative charges are delocalized on the SbSe₂ moiety (Table 6). Treatment of RCOSeSbR (R, R¹ = 4‐MeC₆H₄) with N‐halosuccinimides indicated the formation of Se‐(halocyclohexyl) arenecarboselenoates (Table 8). Pyrolysis of bis(acylseleno)arylbismuth at 150° gave Se‐aryl carboselenoates in moderate to good yields (Table 9).