Chaos and algorithmic complexity |
| |
Authors: | Robert W. Batterman Homer White |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Philosophy, The Ohio State University, 350 University Hall, 43210-1365 Columbus, Ohio;(2) Division of Science and Mathematics, Pikeville College, 41501 Pikeville, Kentucky |
| |
Abstract: | Our aim is to discover whether the notion of algorithmic orbit-complexity can serve to define chaos in a dynamical system. We begin with a mostly expository discussion of algorithmic complexity and certain results of Brudno, Pesin, and Ruelle (BRP theorems) which relate the degree of exponential instability of a dynamical system to the average algorithmic complexity of its orbits. When one speaks of predicting the behavior of a dynamical system, one usually has in mind one or more variables in the phase space that are of particular interest. To say that the system is unpredictable is, roughly, to say that one cannot feasibly determine future values of these variables from an approximation of the initial conditions of the system. We introduce the notions of restrictedexponential instability and conditionalorbit-complexity, and announce a new and rather general result, similar in spirit to the BRP theorems, establishing average conditional orbit-complexity as a lower bound for the degree of restricted exponential instability in a dynamical system. The BRP theorems require the phase space to be compact and metrizable. We construct a noncompact kicked rotor dynamical system of physical interest, and show that the relationship between orbit-complexity and exponential instability fails to hold for this system. We conclude that orbit-complexity cannot serve as a general definition of chaos.![rdquo](/content/u382842513387420/xxlarge8221.gif) |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|