首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Discrepancy in generalized arithmetic progressions
Authors:Javier Cilleruelo  Nils Hebbinghaus  
Institution:aInstituto de Ciencias Matemáticas (CSIC-UAM-UC3M-UCM) and Departamento de Matemáticas, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049-Madrid, Spain;bMax-Planck-Institut für Informatik, Saarbrücken, Germany
Abstract:Estimating the discrepancy of the set of all arithmetic progressions in the first N natural numbers was one of the famous open problems in combinatorial discrepancy theory for a long time, successfully solved by K. Roth (lower bound) and Beck (upper bound). They proved that D(N)=minχmaxA|∑xset membership, variantAχ(x)|=Θ(N1/4), where the minimum is taken over all colorings χ:N]→{−1,1} and the maximum over all arithmetic progressions in N]={0,…,N−1}.Sumsets of k arithmetic progressions, A1+cdots, three dots, centered+Ak, are called k-arithmetic progressions and they are important objects in additive combinatorics. We define Dk(N) as the discrepancy of the set {PN]:P is a k-arithmetic progression}. The second author proved that Dk(N)=Ω(Nk/(2k+2)) and Přívětivý improved it to Ω(N1/2) for all k≥3. Since the probabilistic argument gives Dk(N)=O((NlogN)1/2) for all fixed k, the case k=2 remained the only case with a large gap between the known upper and lower bounds. We bridge this gap (up to a logarithmic factor) by proving that Dk(N)=Ω(N1/2) for all k≥2.Indeed we prove the multicolor version of this result.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号