Discrepancy in generalized arithmetic progressions |
| |
Authors: | Javier Cilleruelo Nils Hebbinghaus |
| |
Institution: | aInstituto de Ciencias Matemáticas (CSIC-UAM-UC3M-UCM) and Departamento de Matemáticas, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049-Madrid, Spain;bMax-Planck-Institut für Informatik, Saarbrücken, Germany |
| |
Abstract: | Estimating the discrepancy of the set of all arithmetic progressions in the first N natural numbers was one of the famous open problems in combinatorial discrepancy theory for a long time, successfully solved by K. Roth (lower bound) and Beck (upper bound). They proved that D(N)=minχmaxA|∑x Aχ(x)|=Θ(N1/4), where the minimum is taken over all colorings χ:N]→{−1,1} and the maximum over all arithmetic progressions in N]={0,…,N−1}.Sumsets of k arithmetic progressions, A1+ +Ak, are called k-arithmetic progressions and they are important objects in additive combinatorics. We define Dk(N) as the discrepancy of the set {P∩N]:P is a k-arithmetic progression}. The second author proved that Dk(N)=Ω(Nk/(2k+2)) and Přívětivý improved it to Ω(N1/2) for all k≥3. Since the probabilistic argument gives Dk(N)=O((NlogN)1/2) for all fixed k, the case k=2 remained the only case with a large gap between the known upper and lower bounds. We bridge this gap (up to a logarithmic factor) by proving that Dk(N)=Ω(N1/2) for all k≥2.Indeed we prove the multicolor version of this result. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|