Affiliation: | (1) Institute for Geothermal Problems of the Dagestan Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 367003 Makhachkala, Shamilya Strasse 39-A, Dagestan, Russia;(2) Present address: Physical and Chemical Properties Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 325 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado, 80305;(3) Azerbaijan State Oil Academy, Baku, 370601, Azerbaijan |
Abstract: | Densities of four (2.124, 2.953, 5.015 and 6.271 mol-kg−1) and viscosities of eight (0.265, 0.503, 0.665, 1.412, 2.106, 2.977, 5.015 and 6.271 mol-kg−1) NaNO3(aq) solutions have been measured with a constant-volume piezometer immersed in a precision liquid thermostat and using capillary flow techniques, respectively. Measurements were made at pressures up to 30 MPa. The temperature range was 298–607 K for the density measurements and 298–576 K for the viscosity measurements. The total uncertainty of density, viscosity, pressure, temperature and composition measurements were estimated to be less than 0.06%, 1.6%, 0.05%, 15 mK and 0.02%, respectively. The temperature, pressure and concentration dependence of density and viscosity of NaNO3(aq) solutions were studied. The measured values of density and viscosity of NaNO3(aq) were compared with data and correlations reported in the literature. Apparent molar volumes were derived using the measured density values. The viscosity data have been interpreted in terms of the extended Jones–Dole equation for strong electrolytes. The values of the viscosity A-, B-, D- and F-coefficients of the extended Jones–Dole equation for the relative viscosity (η/η0) of NaNO3(aq) solutions were evaluated as a function of temperature. The derived values of the viscosity A- and B-coefficients were compared with the results predicted by Falkenhagen–Dole theory of electrolyte solutions and calculated with the ionic B-coefficient data. |