Role of surfactant type and concentration for the mean drop size during emulsification in turbulent flow

A systematic experimental study of the effect of several factors on the mean drop diameter, d32, during emulsification, is performed with soybean oil-in-water emulsions. These factors are (1) type of used emulsifier; (2) emulsifier concentration, CS; and (3) ionic strength of the aqueous solution. Three different types of emulsifier, anionic (sodium dodecyl sulfate, SDS), nonionic (polyoxyethylene-20 cetyl ether, Brij 58), and protein (whey protein concentrate), are studied. For all of the studied systems, two well-defined regions are observed in the dependence of d32 on CS: at low surfactant concentration, d32 increases significantly with the decrease of CS (region 1), whereas d32 does not depend on CS at high surfactant concentration (region 2). The model, proposed by Tcholakova et al. (Langmuir 2003, 19, 5640), is found to describe well the dependence of d32 on CS in region 1 for the nonionic surfactant and for the protein emulsifier at high electrolyte concentration, 150 mM NaCl. According to this model, a well defined minimal surfactant adsorption (close to that of the dense adsorption monolayer) is needed for obtaining an emulsion. On the other hand, this model is found inapplicable to emulsions stabilized by the ionic surfactant, SDS, and by the nonionic surfactant, Brij 58, at low electrolyte concentration. The performed theoretical analysis of drop-drop interactions, in the emulsification equipment, shows that a strong electrostatic repulsion between the colliding drops impedes the drop-drop coalescence in the latter systems, so that smaller emulsion drops are obtained in comparison with the theoretically predicted ones. The results for SDS-stabilized emulsions in region 1 are explained by a quantitative consideration of this electrostatic repulsion. The drop size in region 2 (surfactant-rich regime) is described very well by the Kolmogorov-Hinze theory of turbulent emulsification.