| Abstract: | The solid‐state three‐dimensional ordering of polyaniline–dopant complexes was investigated with four structurally different sulfonic acid dopants. The doped materials were produced in three different ways: polyaniline emeraldine base doped with sulfonic acid (aqueous route), in situ polymerization at the organic–water solvent interface (interfacial route), and in situ polymerization in organic and aqueous solvent mixtures (bilayer route). p‐Toluenesulfonic acid (PTSA), 5‐sulfosalicilic acid (SSA), camphorsulfonic acid (CSA), and dodecylbenzene sulfonic acid (DBSA) were employed as dopants. The conductivity of the aqueous‐route samples showed 10 and 100 times higher conductivity than the interfacial and bilayer routes, respectively. WXRD studies suggested that the crystallinity of the doped samples was dependent on both the structure of the dopants and the polymerization techniques. DBSA increases the polyaniline interplanar distance and produced highly crystalline materials via the aqueous and bilayer routes but failed with the interfacial route because of poor solubility in water. CSA, PTSA, and SSA produced highly crystalline samples by the interfacial route but failed with the aqueous (except for CSA) and bilayer routes. SEM analysis revealed that the doped materials of the interfacial route had excellent continuous morphology and uniform submicrometer‐size particle distributions in comparison with those of the aqueous and bilayer routes. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 43: 1321–1331, 2005 |
