Variability of procedural blanks leads to greater uncertainty in assessing detection limits for the measurement of polonium-210 |
| |
Authors: | Peter Medley Andreas Bollhöfer Paul Martin |
| |
Institution: | 1. Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, GPO Box 461, Darwin, NT, 0801, Australia 2. Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, 619 Lower Plenty Road, Yallambie, VIC, 3085, Australia
|
| |
Abstract: | Low-level measurements of 210Po using alpha spectrometry with a 209Po tracer have been conducted at the Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist (eriss) for many years, on samples with a range of activity concentrations spanning several orders of magnitude. These samples originated from a wide range of research and monitoring projects, and included a wide variety of traditional foods consumed by the indigenous population in Australia’s Northern Territory. Assessment of instrument blank and analyte blank data from these measurements collected over a period of 8 years was conducted. Instrumental blank data for 210Po and 209Po generally followed a normal distribution, whereas analyte blank data for 210Po followed a lognormal distribution. Instrumental blank data for 209Po indicated an increasing trend, indicative of a low level of polonium volatilisation from prepared sources. Lower limits of detection, including the critical limit, detection limit and quantification limit have been calculated. The critical limit ranges from 12 to 37 counts per day. Detection and quantification limits range from 0.18 to 0.33 mBq and 2.3 to 3.6 mBq for a 4-day count, with an assumed mean chemical recovery of 53 %. These limits are relatively high for alpha spectrometric techniques due to the high variability of the analyte blank signal and non-normal distribution for 210Po. Native plant species have relatively low activity concentrations of 210Po in their edible fruits and the amount of sample that should be used for analysis to ensure 90 % of fruit samples analysed reach the specified quantification limit was 11 g. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|