首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

中央与地方政府PM2.5治理策略分析
引用本文:周珍,邢瑶瑶,林云,于晓辉,谭志斌,王洁.中央与地方政府PM2.5治理策略分析[J].运筹与管理,2020,29(1):32-37.
作者姓名:周珍  邢瑶瑶  林云  于晓辉  谭志斌  王洁
作者单位:1. 首都师范大学 管理学院,北京 100089;2. 北京理工大学 能源与环境政策研究中心 100081;3. 北京物资学院,北京 101149
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(71874112,71801016,71871002);国家自然科学基金重点项目(71532002);研究阐释当的十九大国家社科基金专项课题(18VSJ066);北京市教委社科计划面上项目(0142132014);北京市大学生实培计划项目;首都师范大学科技创新服务能力建设项目
摘    要:本文以京津冀雾霾治理为例,综合考虑了PM2.5在地区间的非对称性跨界传输影响、PM2.5治理对民众、企业、政府带来的协同效应。从中央与地方政府视角对比分析了减排指标约束下利益各方的PM2.5治理策略偏好。研究表明:由于跨界传输因子的影响,合作与非合作时污染物的去除量不一定相等。当各地合作与非合作污染物去除量相等时,合作与非合作成本无差异;否则,合作成本优于非合作,而合作成本的降低源于总体减排量减少。如果跨界传输因子增大或减小,合作与非合作治理的成本差距相应地会增加或减小,各地方政府合作治理意愿会逐渐增大或减小;而中央政府可能更希望地方政府在完成减排指标时能尽可能多减排,因此倾向于地方政府采取非合作治理。减排指标设置时应考虑合作与非合作时收益差异,以及各地经济发展水平等因素的影响。

关 键 词:PM2.5治理  合作博弈  跨界传输因子  Shapley值  
收稿时间:2018-10-08

PM2.5 Governance Strategy Analysis of Central and Local government perspectives
ZHOU Zhen,XING Yao-yao,LIN Yun,YU Xiao-hui,TAN Zhi-bin,WANG Jie.PM2.5 Governance Strategy Analysis of Central and Local government perspectives[J].Operations Research and Management Science,2020,29(1):32-37.
Authors:ZHOU Zhen  XING Yao-yao  LIN Yun  YU Xiao-hui  TAN Zhi-bin  WANG Jie
Institution:1. School of Management, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100089, China;2. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China;3. Beijing Wuzi University, Beijing 101149, China
Abstract:This paper analyzes the preference of PM2.5 governance strategies from the perspective of central and local governments by comprehensively considering the impact of PM2.5 on asymmetric cross-border transmission between regions, and the synergistic effect of PM2.5 governance on people, businesses, and governments. The results show that: the removal of cooperation and non-cooperation is not the same all the time due to the influence of transboundary transmission factors. There is no difference between the cost of cooperation and non-cooperation when the amount of cooperation and non-cooperation between regions is the same; otherwise, the cost of cooperation is lower than that of non-cooperation. With the reduction(increase)of cross-border transmission factors between regions, the cost gap between cooperative and non-cooperative governance is reduced(increased), and governments at all levels are more inclined to non-cooperative governance(the central government may wish to cooperate). The emission reduction target setting should consider the difference in returns between cooperation and non-cooperation, as well as the impact of factors such as the level of economic development.
Keywords:PM2  5 control  cooperative game  cross-boundary transmission factors  Shapley value  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《运筹与管理》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《运筹与管理》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号