POTENTIAL ERRORS IN THE USE OF CELLULOSE DIACETATE AND MYLAR FILTERS IN UV-B RADIATION STUDIES |
| |
Authors: | Elizabeth M. Middleton Alan H. Teramura |
| |
Affiliation: | Laboratory for Terrestrial Physics, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA;Department of Botany, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20744, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Abstract— The increase in UV-B radiation(290–320 nm) penetrating to the earth's surface as a result of the chemical depletion of the stratospheric ozone layer is an important environmental concern. In most studies using artificial UV-B sources, the determination of enhanced UV-B radiation effects on plants relies on equivalent UV-A radiation(320–400 nm) from the experimental UV-B fluorescent lamp source, filtered with either cellulose diacetate (CA) to create UV-B treatments, or with type S Mylar or polyester (PE) to create controls (no UV-B). The spectral irradiance in the UV-A was measured in the dark below lamps at two daily UV-B irradiance levels (14.1 and 10.7 W m-2) with CA and PE at two ages. Highly significant differences in UV-A radiation (P 0.01) were measured below the treatment/control pairs at both fluence rates and filter ages. Filter aging was observed, which reduced the UV-A irradiance, especially for PE. The total daily ambient UV-A irradiance was also determined in the glasshouse at three seasons: the fall equinox, summer and winter, from which the total daily UV-A (lamp + ambient) irradiances were calculated. The addition of low to moderate ambient irradiance removed the treatment/control differences in the longwave UV-A(350–400 nm); however, the treatment/contro1 differences remained in the shortwave UV-A(320–350 nm), which was restricted by the glass, and in the total UV-A. The treatment/control differences persisted in the shortwave UV-A for the higher irradiance level, even under high summer ambient light. Also, spectral ratios (UVB:UV-A and shortwave: longwave UV-A) for all treatment groups decreased as the ambient UV-A radiation increased. Therefore, a range of experimental conditions exist where PE-covered lamps do not provide adequate control for UV-A irradiance, relative to the CA treatment, for glasshouse/growth chamber experiments. Potential complications in the interpretation of plant response exist for UV-B experiments conducted under low ambient light conditions (e.g. growth chambers; glasshouse in winter) or high daily UV-B irradiances (e.g. 14 kJ m-2) for those plant responses that are sensitive to UV-A radiation. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|