首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

LIBS分析模型对铝合金定量分析精度的影响
引用本文:李明亮,戴宇佳,秦爽,宋超,高勋,林景全. LIBS分析模型对铝合金定量分析精度的影响[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2022, 42(2): 587-591. DOI: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2022)02-0587-05
作者姓名:李明亮  戴宇佳  秦爽  宋超  高勋  林景全
作者单位:长春理工大学理学院 ,吉林 长春 130022;长春理工大学化学与环境工程学院 ,吉林 长春 130022
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(61575030);
摘    要:为了提高铝合金定量分析的精度,将激光诱导击穿光谱技术与多变量线性回归、中值高斯核支持向量机回归及标准化偏最小二乘回归等方法相结合,建立铝合金中C u元素定量分析模型.对采集的L IBS光谱进行三阶极小值去背景和小波阈值降噪处理,从而提高LIBS光谱的信背比.将处理后数据筛选最佳训练集、预测集并用多变量线性回归、中值高斯...

关 键 词:激光诱导击穿光谱  标准化偏最小二乘回归  中值高斯核支持向量机回归  多变量回归  铝合金
收稿时间:2021-01-16

Influence of LIBS Analysis Model on Quantitative Analysis Precision of Aluminum Alloy
LI Ming-liang,DAI Yu-jia,QIN Shuang,SONG Chao,GAO Xun,LIN Jing-quan. Influence of LIBS Analysis Model on Quantitative Analysis Precision of Aluminum Alloy[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2022, 42(2): 587-591. DOI: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2022)02-0587-05
Authors:LI Ming-liang  DAI Yu-jia  QIN Shuang  SONG Chao  GAO Xun  LIN Jing-quan
Affiliation:1. School of Science, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun 130022, China2. School of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun 130022, China
Abstract:In order to improve the accuracy of quantitative analysis of aluminum alloy, a quantitative analysis model of Cu element in aluminum alloy was established by combining laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy with multivariate linear regression, median Gaussian kernel support vector machine regression and standardized partial least squares regression. Third order minimum background removal and wavelet threshold denoising were performed on the collected LIBS spectra to improve the SNR of LIBS spectra. The optimal training set and prediction set were selected from the processed data. The calibration model was established using multi variable linear regression method, medium Gaussian kernel support vector machine regression method and normalized partial least squares fitting regression method. Two characteristic lines of Cu Ⅰ 324.80 nm and Cu Ⅰ 327.43 nm and Libs spectral data in the range of 323~329 nm were used for quantitative analysis. The fitting coefficient (R2), root mean square error (RMSEC), root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) and average relative error (ARE) of the three Libs quantitative analysis models were compared and analyzed. The results show that compared with the multivariable linear regression method and medium Gaussian kernel support vector machine regression method, the precision and accuracy of the standardized PLSR model are significantly improved for the quantitative analysis of Cu element in aluminum alloy, and the R2, RMSEC, RMSEP and ARE of the Libs calibration curves are 0.997, 0.014 Wt%, 0.129 Wt% and 3.053%, respectively. The results show that the standardized PLSR method has more advantages in improving the accuracy and generalization of the calibration model, and can effectively reduce the influence of parameter fluctuation and self-absorption effect on the quantitative analysis of aluminum alloy.
Keywords:Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy  Standardized partial least squares regression  Medium Gaussian kernel support vector machine regression  Multivariate regression  Aluminum alloy
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《光谱学与光谱分析》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《光谱学与光谱分析》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号