首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Optimization of ultrasound assisted-emulsification-dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction by experimental design methodologies for the determination of sulfur compounds in wines by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
Authors:Jofré Viviana P  Assof Mariela V  Fanzone Martín L  Goicoechea Héctor C  Martínez Luis D  Silva María F
Affiliation:a Laboratorio de Aromas y Sustancias Naturales, Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), San Martín 3853, CP 5700, Mendoza, Argentina
b Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Avda. Rivadavia 1917, CP C1033AAJ, Buenos Aires, Argentina
c IBAM, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, CONICET. Alte. Brown 500, CP 5505, Chacras de Coria, Mendoza, Argentina
d INQUISAL, Departamento de Química, Universidad Nacional de San Luis, CONICET. Chacabuco y Pedernera. CP D5700BWS. San Luis, Argentina
e Laboratorio de Desarrollo Analítico y Quimiometría (LADAQ), Cátedra de Química Analítica I, Facultad de Bioquímica y Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Ciudad Universitaria, CP S3000ZAA, Santa Fe, Argentina
Abstract:A new method was developed for analyzing sulfur compounds in the aroma of white wines using ultrasound assisted-emulsification-dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry detection. In the present work, the analytical method for simultaneous determination of seven sulfur compounds (methylmercaptoacetate, methyl(methylthio)acetate, 2-methylthioethanol, 3-methylthiopropanol, 3-methylthiohexanol, 4-methylthio-4-methyl-2-pentanone and hexanethiol) is reported. Parameters that affect the efficiency of the methodology such as extracting and dispersing solvents, sample volume, ion strength, cavitation time and centrifugation time were investigated using a fractionated factorial 26-1 (R = V) screening design. Then, the factors presenting significant positive effects on the analytical response (extracting volume, ion strength, cavitation time and centrifugation time) were considered in a further central composite design to optimize the operational conditions for the ultrasound assisted-emulsification-dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction procedure. Additionally, multiple response simultaneous optimization by using the desirability function was used to find the optimum experimental conditions. The best results were obtained using pH sample 4.25, extractant volume 150 μL, ionic strength 8.75% NaCl, cavitation time 20 s and centrifugation time 50 s. The use of the optimized ultrasound assisted-emulsification-dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction technique allowed to obtain the best extraction results with the minimum interference from other substances from the matrix, and it allowed to quantify the analytes in white wine samples by calibration graphs. Recoveries ranging from 91.99% to 125.87% for all sulfur compounds proved the accuracy of the proposed method in white wine samples. Method detection limits were in the range of 0.36-1.67 ng mL−1 and limits of quantitation were between 0.63 and 3.02 ng mL−1 for sulfur compounds in white wine samples. The proposed methodology was successfully applied for the determination concentrations of sulfur compounds in different commercial Chardonnay wine samples from Mendoza, Argentine.
Keywords:SCs, sulfur compounds   GC-MS, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry   LLE, liquid-liquid extraction   DLLME, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction   SPME, solid-phase micro-extraction   LPME, liquid-liquid microextraction   USALLE, ultrasound assisted liquid-liquid extraction   USAEME, ultrasound assisted emulsification-microextraction   CCD, central composite design   IS, internal standard   OFAT, one-factor-a-time methodology   EF, enrichment factors   MTMP, 4-methylthio-4-methyl-2-pentanone   MTH, 3-methylthiohexanol   MTA, methylmercaptoacetate   MMTA, methyl(methylthio)acetate   MTE, 2-methylthioethanol   ME, 2-mercaptoethanol   MTP, 3-methylthiopropanol   HT, hexanethiol
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号