Isotopic Labeling Reveals Active Reaction Interfaces for Electrochemical Oxidation of Lithium Peroxide

The unresolved debate on the active reaction interface of electrochemical oxidation of lithium peroxide (Li₂O₂) prevents rational electrode and catalyst design for lithium‐oxygen (Li‐O₂) batteries. The reaction interface is studied by using isotope‐labeling techniques combined with time‐of‐flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF‐SIMS) and on‐line electrochemical mass spectroscopy (OEMS) under practical cell operation conditions. Isotopically labelled microsized Li₂O₂ particles with an Li₂¹⁶O₂/electrode interface and an Li₂¹⁸O₂/electrolyte interface were fabricated. Upon oxidation, ¹⁸O₂ was evolved for the first quarter of the charge capacity followed by ¹⁶O₂. These observations unambiguously demonstrate that oxygen loss starts from the Li₂O₂/electrolyte interface instead of the Li₂O₂/electrode interface. The Li₂O₂ particles are in continuous contact with the catalyst/electrode, explaining why the solid catalyst is effective in oxidizing solid Li₂O₂ without losing contact.