Dihydrogen complexes of iridium and rhodium

A series of iridium and rhodium pincer complexes have been synthesized and characterized: (POCOP)Ir(H)(H(2))] BAr(f)(4)] (1-H(3)), (POCOP)Rh(H(2)) (2-H(2)), (PONOP)Ir(C(2)H(4))] BAr(f)(4)] (3-C(2)H(4)), (PONOP)Ir(H)(2))] BAr(f)(4)] (3-H(2)), (PONOP)Rh(C(2)H(4))] BAr(f)(4)] (4-C(2)H(4)) and (PONOP)Rh(H(2))] BAr(f)(4)] (4-H(2)) (POCOP = κ(3)-C(6)H(3)-2,6-OP(tBu)(2)](2); PONOP = 2,6-(tBu(2)PO)(2)C(5)H(3)N; BAr(f)(4) = tetrakis(3,5-trifluoromethylphenyl)borate). The nature of the dihydrogen-metal interaction was probed using NMR spectroscopic studies. Complexes 1-H(3), 2-H(2), and 4-H(2) retain the H-H bond and are classified as η(2)-dihydrogen adducts. In contrast, complex 3-H(2) is best described as a classical dihydride system. The presence of bound dihydrogen was determined using both T(1) and (1)J(HD) coupling values: T(1) = 14 ms, (1)J(HD) = 33 Hz for the dihydrogen ligand in 1-H(3), T(1)(min) = 23 ms, (1)J(HD) = 32 Hz for 2-H(2), T(1)(min) = 873 ms for 3-H(2), T(1)(min) = 33 ms, (1)J(HD) = 30.1 Hz for 4-H(2).