首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


The analysis of silica suspensions atomization
Institution:1. Institute of Chemistry of Komi SC UB RAS, Pervomaiskaya St., 48, Syktyvkar, Russia;2. Syktyvkar State University, Oktyabrsky Prospect, 55, Syktyvkar, Russia;3. Boreskov Institute of Catalysis SB RAS, Pr. Lavrentieva, 5, Novosibirsk, Russia;4. Novosibirsk State University, Pirogova, 2, Russia;1. Laboratory of Applied Materials Chemistry (CMA), University of Namur, 61 rue de Bruxelles, 5000 Namur, Belgium;2. Department of Applied Science and Technology, Polytechnic of Turin, Institute of Chemistry, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24, 10129 Torino, Italy;1. Estación Experimental INTA Famaillá, Ruta Provincial 301, km 32, 4132 Famaillá, Tucumán, Argentina;2. CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina;3. Estación Experimental INTA Salta, Ruta Nacional 68, km 172, 4403 Salta, Argentina
Abstract:The paper contains the results of experimental investigation of air–water and air–silica suspension atomization process in effervescent nozzles with internal mixing obtained by the use of the digital microphotography method. In experiments the different aqueous solutions of silica Aerosil 300 of different concentration have been used. The suspensions containing up to 0.04 (kg solid particles/kg solution) have Newtonian rheological properties. The observations were carried out at liquid flow rates changed from 0.0014 to 0.011 (kg/s) and gas flow rates from 0.00015 to 0.0065 (kg/s). It corresponded to gas to liquid mass ratios (GLR) values from 0.014 to 0.46. The analysis of photos shows that the droplets which have been formed during the liquid atomization have very different sizes. The differences between characteristics of effervescent atomization for water and suspensions used have not been observed. The present study confirmed the previous reports which suggested that the small particles added to solution do not change spray characteristics. The experimental results show that CD and SMD are non-linear functions of GLR. Their values are decreasing rapidly as GLR is increased from zero to around 0.07 and thereafter decreasing at a slower rate with further increase in GLR. In the same point (GLR = 0.07) the value of α is maximal. The first regime is characteristic for bubbly flow. The second is typical of annular flow regime. Boundary between bubbly and annular flow regime is observed at GLR = 0.07 for investigated systems. The correlations for CD and Sauter mean diameter were proposed. The results may be used for example to verify numerical models or comparisons with respect to similar atomization processes.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号