首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

也论绍兴和议期间士人的气节问题——与王曾瑜先生商榷
引用本文:舒仁辉,王淑君.也论绍兴和议期间士人的气节问题——与王曾瑜先生商榷[J].杭州师范学院学报(社会科学版),2003(2):94-100.
作者姓名:舒仁辉  王淑君
作者单位:杭州师范学院,人文学院,浙江,杭州,310012
摘    要:王曾瑜先生判断历史人物失节的标准不当,错误地将朱熹、张孝祥、范成大等名士划入失节的范围。他把专制腐败政治作为导致古代士人失节的第一位因素和士人失节是正常状态、守节反而是非常状态的观点都是错误的。

关 键 词:南宋  绍兴和议  士人  气节问题  商榷
文章编号:1293/Z(2003)02-0094-07
修稿时间:2002年2月1日

A Debate on the Moral Integrity of Scholars during 1142- 1161 of the Southern Song Dynasty--To Discuss with Mr. Wang Zengyu
U Ren\|hui,WANG Shu jun.A Debate on the Moral Integrity of Scholars during 1142- 1161 of the Southern Song Dynasty--To Discuss with Mr. Wang Zengyu[J].Journal of Hangzhou Teachers College(Humanities and Social Sciences),2003(2):94-100.
Authors:U Ren\|hui  WANG Shu jun
Abstract:The criteria Mr. Wang Zengyu used to judge the betrayal of historical scholars are in question. He incorrectly put Zhu Xi, Zhang Xiaoxiang, Fan Chengda and other famous scholars in the list of betrayal. He regarded the dictatorial and corrupted political system as the major factor to the betrayal of the ancient scholars. He also asserted that the betrayal of the scholars he referred to was normal, but the integrity of them was abnormal. Unfortunately, we believe that his arguments are not correct.
Keywords:Southern Song Dynasty  Gaozong's reign  scholar  moral integrity  discussion
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号