首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Accreditation of PT providers – is it worth the money?
Authors:Anthony J Russell  Ulf Örnemark  Lena Hård  Gunnar Nordin
Institution:(1) NATA, 7 Leeds Street, Rhodes, NSW 2138, Australia;(2) EQUALIS, Box 977, 751 09 Uppsala, Sweden
Abstract:This topic is being presented from two perspectives, namely the views of an accreditation body and those of an accredited provider of external quality assessment schemes. The first perspective, from an accreditation body, is based on the experience of Australia's national laboratory accreditation body (NATA), which has accredited fourteen proficiency testing (PT) providers and is currently processing an application from another. The second perspective is based on the experience of EQUALIS, the national quality assurance organisation for laboratory medicine in Sweden, which was granted accreditation in 2002.Presented at 5th Eurachem Workshop on Proficiency testing in analytical chemistry, microbiology and laboratory medicine, Portorož (Slovenia) 25–27 Sept 2005
Keywords:Proficiency testing  External quality assessment  Accreditation  Value for money
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号