On Auger electron spectroscopic measurements of ZnCl2 —coal interaction

By combining electron stimulated desorption (ESD) with low energy electron diffraction (LEED), Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) and work function change (Δφ) measurements the information content of ESD with regard to surface structure and composition is examined, using the surface systems O/W(100) and O/W(110). Although it is not possible to separate the local interaction from the ion escape phase, the comparison of the ESD results with Information derived from LEED, AES and Δφ and the use of simple models of the local interaction gives a rather detailed picture of the location and environment of adsorbed atoms which provides a reasonably reliable basis for the interpretation of UPS spectra of adsorption layers.ESD is extremely sensitive to adsorbed layers. The fact that the ion signal depends not only on coverage but also on the structure and structure-dependent properties of the adsorbate makes on the one hand coverage determination difficult if not impossible, on the other hand opens the door to structure analysis. The potential for obtaining structure information can be easily assessed by comparison with electron probe results.In comparison with other ion probes such as ion scattering spectroscopy and secondary ion mass spectroscopy, ESD is at present the most promising ion probe method for obtaining information on the location of adsorbed atoms from angular and energy distribution measurement (ESDIAD and ESDIED). This is clearly seen by the comparison with the structural data derived from LEED, AES and Δφ measurements for the complex system O/W(100). The consistency of the data obtained with ESD and electron probe techniques lends strong support to the simple models on which the analysis of the ESD results from chemisorbed layers are based. The comparison of ESD results from the system O/W(100) at high coverage and from O/W(110) with 0⁺ ion emission from oxides shows, however, that caution is in place when assigning ESD features to atoms chemisorbed on the metal surface. Without a careful analysis of the ion energy, threshold and/or cross-section such ions cannot be distinguished from ions produced by dissociation of oxides which may be present on the surface only in small quantity. These ions usually are not related to the chemisorbed species which covers most of the surface and therefore dominates the signals seen with (nearly) all other surface probes.If the consistency of LEED, AES, Δφ and ESD data for O/W(100) is not fortuitous, then ESD has already given some important feed-back to the electron probe techniques: the structural models derived from vibrational ELS spectra have to be revised. Increasing accumulation of experimental data and deepening of the theoretical understanding of the physical processes involved in ion emission will have to show how much further information complementary to that from electron probes can be obtained from ion probes.