首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Drawdown: from practice to theory and back again
Authors:Lisa R. Goldberg  Ola Mahmoud
Affiliation:1.Department of Statistics and Economics, Center for Risk Management Research, and Consortium for Data Analytics in Risk,University of California,Berkeley,USA;2.Faculty of Mathematics and Statistics,University of St. Gallen,St. Gallen,Switzerland;3.Center for Risk Management Research,University of California,Berkeley,USA
Abstract:Maximum drawdown, the largest cumulative loss from peak to trough, is one of the most widely used indicators of risk in the fund management industry, but one of the least developed in the context of measures of risk. We formalize drawdown risk as Conditional Expected Drawdown (CED), which is the tail mean of maximum drawdown distributions. We show that CED is a degree one positive homogenous risk measure, so that it can be linearly attributed to factors; and convex, so that it can be used in quantitative optimization. We empirically explore the differences in risk attributions based on CED, Expected Shortfall (ES) and volatility. An important feature of CED is its sensitivity to serial correlation. In an empirical study that fits AR(1) models to US Equity and US Bonds, we find substantially higher correlation between the autoregressive parameter and CED than with ES or with volatility.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号