Factors affecting membrane fouling reduction by surface modification and backpulsing

Several factors affecting microfiltration membrane fouling and cleaning, including backpulsing, crossflushing, backwashing, particle size, membrane surface chemistry, and ionic strength, were investigated with suspensions of latex beads. Approximately two-fold permeate volume enhancements over 1 h of filtration were obtained by using water or gas backpulsing, and 50% enhancement was obtained with crossflushing, for filtration of 1.0 μm diameter carboxylate modified latex (CML) particles using unmodified polypropylene (PP) membranes of 0.3 μm nominal pore diameter. When 0.2 μm diameter CML particles or mixtures of 1.0 and 0.2 μm CML particles were used, however, the average flux decreased 60% compared with using 1.0 μm CML particles for experiments with or without backpulsing.PP membranes were rendered hydrophilic with neutral or positively on negatively charged surfaces by grafting monomers of poly(ethylene glycol 200) monomethacrylate (PEG200MA), dimethyl aminoethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA), or acrylic acid (AA), respectively, to the base PP membranes. Filtration experiments show that fouling is not strongly dependent on membrane surface chemistry for filtration of 1.0 μm CML particles without backpulsing. With backpulsing, however, a 10% increase and a 20% decrease of permeate volumes collected in 1 h were observed when the CML particles and the membranes had like charges and opposite charges, respectively, compared to the permeate collected with the unmodified membrane. Using the PP membranes modified with AA, permeate volumes with backpulsing decreased 30 and 40% when NaCl concentrations of 0.01 and 0.1 M, respectively, were added to the feed. However, the permeate volumes did not vary significantly with changing ionic strength for filtration without backpulsing.