屈原与司马迁悲剧意识之比较

屈原和司马迁分别是战国末期楚国和西汉武帝时期的文学家。他们身上都弥漫着深沉的悲剧意识。这种悲剧意识集中体现在他们的悲剧命运和他们对待悲剧命运的态度这两个方面。屈原的悲剧是乱世之悲。司马迁的悲剧是盛世之悲。两人的悲剧实质上都是源于个人人格与黑暗势力的冲突。面对悲剧命运，屈原选择了自沉汨罗，以死“殉道”；司马迁则选择了忍辱著书，用生“矢志”。他们都在“发愤”中发泄了自己的情感，并最终寻求到了各自的解脱。

A Comparison of the Tragic Consciousness of Qu Yuan and Sima Qian

Qu Yuan and Sima Qian are respectively literateurs of Chu, one of state in the late Warring States Period, the western Han dynasty during the reign of Emperor Wu. The deep tragic consciousness could be found easily from their tragedy fate of two and attitude towards their tragedy fates. Qu Yuan＇s tragedy was the sad of tumultuous times and Sima Qian＇s tragedy was the sad of prosperous times. Their tragedy are rooted from the conflict of their individual personality and the evil forces in essence. Facing the tragic destiny, their attitudes are different： Qu Yuan chose to sink the Miluo River, with die for justice while Sima Qian chose to endure the shame to write books, with live for vows. Both of them made a determined effort in order to vent their own emotion, and finally found out deliverance respectively.