Comparison of 3D quantitative structure-activity relationship methods: Analysis of the in vitro antimalarial activity of 154 artemisinin analogues by hypothetical active-site lattice and comparative molecular field analysis |
| |
| Authors: | John R Woolfrey Mitchell A Avery Arthur M Doweyko |
| |
| Institution: | (1) Department of Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University, MS, 38677, U.S.A.;(2) National Center for the Development of Natural Products, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University, MS, 38677, U.S.A;(3) Department of Chemistry, University of Mississippi, University, MS, 38677, U.S.A;(4) Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, 08543, U.S.A |
| |
| Abstract: | Two three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) methods, comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) and hypothetical active site lattice (HASL), were compared with respect to the analysis of a training set of 154 artemisinin analogues. Five models were created, including a complete HASL and two trimmed versions, as well as two CoMFA models (leave-one-out standard CoMFA and the guided-region selection protocol). Similar r2 and q2 values were obtained by each method, although some striking differences existed between CoMFA contour maps and the HASL output. Each of the four predictive models exhibited a similar ability to predict the activity of a test set of 23 artemisinin analogues, although some differences were noted as to which compounds were described well by either model. |
| |
| Keywords: | antimalarial artemisinin comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) hypothetical active-site lattice (HASL) quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) |
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ |
|
