首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

基于JLAMT可视化建模的JMCT模拟计算
引用本文:郑俞,全国萍,李刚. 基于JLAMT可视化建模的JMCT模拟计算[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2017, 29(3): 036017. DOI: 10.11884/HPLPB201628.160291
作者姓名:郑俞  全国萍  李刚
作者单位:1.华北电力大学 核科学与工程学院, 北京 1 02206;
摘    要:JMCT是中国工程物理研究院高性能数值模拟软件中心粒子输运团队自主研发的三维蒙特卡罗模拟软件,JLAMT为其前处理可视化建模工具。使用JLAMT和JMCT程序对BW,KRITZ,BEAVRS等系列基准题进行了模拟,并对有效增殖系数及计数功能进行了对比分析。其中有效增殖系数计算结果与MCNP5的最大偏差为KRITZ2装载方案19基准题的89.1 pcm,除BEAVRS基准题外的计数结果与MCNP5的偏差基本小于2%,平均偏差在1%左右;BEAVRS基准题功率分布模拟结果与MCNP5及实测值最大偏差分别为7.06%,16.6%,控制棒价值计算与MCNP5及实测值均吻合较好。,

关 键 词:蒙特卡罗   可视化建模   粒子输运
收稿时间:2016-06-16

Simulation of JMCT based on JLAMT visualized modeling tool
Affiliation:1.School of Nuclear Science and Engineering,North China Electric Power University of China,Beijing 102206,China;2.State Nuclear Power Software Development Center,SPIC,Beijing 100029,China;3.Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics,Beijing 100094,China
Abstract:The 3-D Monte Carlo transport code JMCT is developed by Software Center for High Performance Numerical Simulation independently and JLAMT is its pre-processing visualized modeling tool. Benchmarks including BW, KRITZ, BEAVRS et al were simulated by JMCT and MCNP5 codes, in addition, the effective multiplication factors and tally results were compared with the MCNP5 code and measured data separately. Effective multiplication factor calculations between two codes agree well with each other within 89.1 pcm for the KRITZ2 benchmark, the relative difference in power distribution between JMCT and MCNP5 is below 2% mostly, average difference is about 1%; as for BEAVRS benchmark, the maximum differences of the core radial power distribution of JMCT compared to MCNP5 and measurements are 7.06% and 16.6% respectively, JMCT control rod bank worth calculation results show good agreement of JMCT with MCNP5 and measurement.
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《强激光与粒子束》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《强激光与粒子束》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号