首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于可见-近红外光谱比较主成分回归、偏最小二乘回归和反向传播神经网络对土壤氮的预测研究
引用本文:李硕,汪善勤,张美琴.基于可见-近红外光谱比较主成分回归、偏最小二乘回归和反向传播神经网络对土壤氮的预测研究[J].光学学报,2012,32(8):830001-301.
作者姓名:李硕  汪善勤  张美琴
作者单位:李硕:华中农业大学资源与环境学院, 湖北 武汉 430070
汪善勤:华中农业大学资源与环境学院, 湖北 武汉 430070中国科学院土壤与农业可持续发展国家重点实验室, 江苏 南京 210008
张美琴:华中农业大学资源与环境学院, 湖北 武汉 430070
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(40801082)资助课题。
摘    要:建模方法是影响可见-近红外光谱定量结果的主要因素之一。在470~1000nm波段的12个土壤剖面对48个剖面样经过风干、研磨、过筛后进行光谱采集。经一阶微分变换及Savizky-Golay平滑处理后,分别应用主成分回归(PCR)、偏最小二乘回归(PLSR)和反向传播神经网络(BPNN)3种方法建立土壤全氮(TN)的定量模型。PCR与PLSR两线性模型的决定系数(R2)分别为0.74和0.8,其剩余预测偏差(RPD)分别为2.23和2.22,但两模型仅能用于TN的粗略估计。由PCR提供主成分数,PLSR提供潜变量(LV)数分别作为BPNN的输入所构建的两个非线性模型均明显优于线性模型PCR和PLSR。其中以4个LV作为输入的BPNN-LV模型预测性能最优,R2以及RPD分别达到0.9和3.11。实验结果表明,提取可见-近红外光谱的PLSR LV因子作为BPNN的输入,所建定量模型可用于土壤氮纵向时空分布的快速准确预测。

关 键 词:光谱学  土壤光谱  可见近红外  主成分回归  偏最小二乘回归  反向传播神经网络
收稿时间:2012/2/14

Comparison Among Principal Component Regression, Partial Least Squares Regression and Back Propagation Neural Network for Prediction of Soil Nitrogen with Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy
Li Shuo,Wang Shanqin,Zhang Meiqin.Comparison Among Principal Component Regression, Partial Least Squares Regression and Back Propagation Neural Network for Prediction of Soil Nitrogen with Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J].Acta Optica Sinica,2012,32(8):830001-301.
Authors:Li Shuo  Wang Shanqin  Zhang Meiqin
Institution:1 College of Resources and Environment,Huazhong Agricultural University,Wuhan,Hubei 430070,China2 State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Nanjing,Jiangsu210008,China
Abstract:The selection of modeling method is one of the main factors influencing the quantitative accuracy with visible-near infrared (Vis-NIR) spectroscopy. We compare the performance of three calibrations methods, i.e., principal component regression (PCR), partial least squares regression (PLSR), and back propagation neural network (BPNN) based on Vis-NIR reflectance spectra of soil total nitrogen (TN) quantitative forecast results. Covered in the 470~1000 nm wavelength range, spectroscopy of 48 soil samples selected from 12 profiles are air-dried, screened and mushed, then processed by the first order derivative and Savizky-Golay smoothing methods. Leave-one-out cross validation is also adopted to determine the optimal factor numbers. The results indicate that PCR and PLSR linear models are able to meet general prediction and with little difference, where coefficients of determination (R2) are 0.74 and 0.8, respectively, and residual predictive deviation (RPDs) are 2.23 and 2.22. The two nonlinear models built by BPNN in combination with PCR and PLSR, respectively, are superior to the linear models of PCR and PLSR in the precision of prediction. BPNN, principal components (PCs) whose input is the PCs resulted from the PCR, while the BPNN latent variables (LVs) whose input is the first 4 LV results obtained from PLSR has the best performance (R2=0.9, RPD is3.11). It is recommended to adopt BPNN-LV model to rapidly predict the vertical spatial and temporal distribution of TN with Vis-NIR spectroscopy.
Keywords:spectroscopy  soil spectroscopy  visible-near infrared  principal component regression  partial least squares regression  back propagation neural network
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号