| 司法言论“正当性”的比较法研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李军.司法言论“正当性”的比较法研究[J].玉林师范学院学报,2014(4):87-90. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李军 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 江苏泰州学院人文学院,江苏泰州225300 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 2011年度江苏省高校哲学社会科学基金项目《司法伦理研究》（项目编号2011SJD720008）阶段性成果. |
| |
| 摘 要： | 司法言论的“正当性”的内涵在于追求公平和正义,基于“班加罗尔”原则,公正、妥当和平等的伦理原则应视为衡量限制言论的标准,对于司法言论“正当性”的标准,同是英美法系的国家也有不同程度的差异,大陆法系国家在执行类似法制规范上有明显的差别。
|
| 关 键 词： | 司法言论 正当性 差异 比较 |
A Comparative Study of ＂Legitimacy＂ in Judicial Speech |
| |
| LI Jun.A Comparative Study of ＂Legitimacy＂ in Judicial Speech[J].Journal of Yulin Teachers College,2014(4):87-90. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Jun |
| |
| Institution: | LI Jun (Humanities College, Taizhou College, Taizhou, Jiangsu 225300) |
| |
| Abstract: | The connotation of ＂legitimacy＂ in judicial speech lies in the pursuit of fairness and justice. Based on the Principle of Bangalore, ethical principles, such as justice, propriety and equality, etc. should be regarded as a measure for restricted speech. As for the standard of ＂legitimacy＂ in judicial speech, countries, though under the same Anglo-American law system, share differences in certain degree; civil law countries have obvious difference in implementing of similar legal norms. |
| |
| Keywords: | judicial speech legitimacy difference compare |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
