Secondary ion emission from polymer layers by atomic and molecular ion bombardment: Data evaluation based on linear-cascade sputtering theory

This paper constitutes an attempt to rationalise impact-energy dependent yields of molecular secondary ions emitted from polymer samples under bombardment with atomic and molecular primary ions. The evaluation was based upon a comparison with sputtering yields calculated from linear-cascade sputtering theory, including threshold effects. To explore general trends, sputtering yields for carbon, silicon and silver were calculated under impact of normally incident C, F, S, Ga, Xe, Au, SF₅, C_11, C₆₀ and Au₅. The yields of carbon, for example, bombarded with C₆₀ are larger than for Ga by factors of ∼5 and ∼10 at 10 and 100 keV, respectively. However, owing to the fact that the effective threshold energy for sputtering increases with the number of constituents of the projectile, the yields for molecular ion impact start to exceed the yields for atomic ions only at energies between 0.5 and 5 keV. The analysed experimental results relate to molecular ion emission from one monolayer (1 ML) and 9 ML films of polymethacrylate on silver bombarded with Xe and SF₅ ions at energies E between 0.5 and 10 keV. Comparison of (initial) secondary ion yields S⁺ (m/z 143) with calculated sputtering yields suggests that S⁺ constitutes the sum of two contributions. The first, labelled , prevails at low energies and appears to reflect molecule ejection due to the mean effect of nuclear energy deposition (“ordinary” linear-cascade sputtering). The second contribution, , dominates at E > 1.5 keV, increases with a high power of E, but does not correlate with the calculated sputtering yield. It is suggested that is a measure of those impact events which occasionally generate a very high energy density at the surface, thus providing optimum conditions for very efficient ejection of molecules that are located at the rim of the agitated area. The SF₅/Xe secondary ion yield ratios are distinctly different for the two contributions, only about 0.3 for but ∼4 (1 ML) and ∼20 (9 ML) for . The pronounced secondary ion “yield enhancement” frequently reported in the literature for molecular versus atomic ion bombardment appears to be due to an enlargement of the contribution, more so the higher the impact energy and the more massive the projectile. The total (integrated) secondary ion yields, estimated by making use of the reported damage cross sections, were found to be the same for SF₅ bombardment of the 1-ML and the 9-ML samples. This finding calls for more attention towards obtaining high secondary ion yields at minimum sample consumption.