首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


4D-QSAR analysis of a set of ecdysteroids and a comparison to CoMFA modeling.
Authors:M Ravi  A J Hopfinger  R E Hormann  L Dinan
Institution:Laboratory of Molecular Modeling and Design (M/C-781), College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 South Wood Street, Chicago, IL 60612-7231, USA.
Abstract:The ecdysteroid-responsive Drosophila melanogaster B(II) cell line is a prototypical homologous inducible gene expression system. A training set of 71 ecdysteroids, for which the -log(EC(50)) potencies in the ecdysteroid-responsive B(II) cell line were measured, was used to construct 4D-QSAR models. Four nearly equivalent optimum 4D-QSAR models, for two modestly different alignments, were identified (Q(2) = 0.76-0.80). These four models, together with two CoMFA models, were used in consensus modeling to arrive at a three-dimensional pharmacophore. The C-2 and C-22 hydroxyls are identified as hydrogen-bond acceptor sites which enhance activity. A hydrophobic site near C-12 is consistent with increasing activity. The side-chain substituents at C-17 are predicted to adopt semiextended "active" conformations which could fit into a cylinder-shaped binding pocket lined largely with nonpolar residues for enhanced activity. A test set of 20 ecdysteroids was used to evaluate the QSAR models. Two 4D-QSAR models for one alignment were identified to be superior to the others based on having the smallest average residuals of prediction for the prediction set (0.69 and 1.13 -logEC(50)] units). The correlation coefficients of the optimum 4D-QSAR models (R(2) = 0.87 and 0.88) are nearly the same as those of the best CoMFA model (R(2) = 0.92) determined for the same training set. However, the cross-validation correlation coefficient of the CoMFA model is less significant (Q(2) = 0.59) than those of the 4D-QSAR models (Q(2) = 0.80 and 0.80).
Keywords:
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号