首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Preparation,Spectroscopic Properties,and Crystal Structures of Fe2(CO)6(μ‐CO)(μ‐CF2)2, Fe2(CO)6(μ‐CO)2(μ‐CF2), and Fe2(CO)6(μ‐CF2)(PPh3)2 – Theoretical Studies of Methylenic vs. Carbonyl Bridges in Diiron Complexes
Authors:W Petz  F Weller  A Barthel  C Mealli  J Reinhold
Abstract:The reaction of Na2Fe(CO)4] with Br2CF2 in n‐pentane generates a mixture of the compounds (CO)3Fe(μ‐CO)3–n(μ‐CF2)nFe(CO)3 ( 2 , n = 2; 3 , n = 1) in low yields with 3 as the main product. 3 is obtained free from 2 by reacting Br2CF2 with Na2Fe2(CO)8]. The non‐isolable monomeric complex (CO)4Fe=CF2 ( 1 ) can probably considered as the precursor for 2 . 3 reacts with PPh3 with replacement of two CO ligands to form Fe2(CO)6(μ‐CF2)(PPh3)2 ( 4 ). The complexes 2 – 4 were characterized by single crystal X‐ray diffraction. While the structure of 2 is strictly similar to that of Fe2(CO)9, the structure of 3 can better be described as a resulting from superposition of the two enantiomers 3 a and 3 b with two semibridging CO groups. Quantum chemical DFT calculations for the series (CO)3Fe(μCO)3–n(μ‐CF2)nFe(CO)3 (n = 0, 1, 2, 3) as well as for the corresponding (μ‐CH2) derivatives indicate that the progressively larger σ donor and π acceptor properties for the bridging ligands, in the order CO < CF2 < CH2, favor a stronger Fe–Fe bond.
Keywords:Iron carbonyl  Carbondifluoride ligand  DFT calculations  Crystal structure
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号