首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论1926年中比修约中的国际法庭应诉之争
引用本文:洪富忠. 论1926年中比修约中的国际法庭应诉之争[J]. 玉林师范学院学报, 2007, 28(1): 56-59
作者姓名:洪富忠
作者单位:重庆工商大学,财政金融学院,重庆,400067
摘    要:从中比修约中的国际法庭应诉之争全过程来看,比利时是把国际法庭作为胁迫北京政府在修问题上让步的一种手段。在争端原由上,北京政府不拘泥对个别条款的具体解释,这有利于修约外交进一步展开;北京政府在争端性质上的界定及不到国际法庭应诉的外交策略在当时是一个比较明智的选择。北京政府加入国际组织有助于提升中国的国际地位,这些因际组织也为中国向世界展示自身提供了舞台。

关 键 词:中比修约  国际法庭  应诉
文章编号:1004-4671(2007)01-0056-04
修稿时间:2006-05-12

A Study of Argument with Lawsuit to International Court of Justice between China and Belgium Revision Treaties in 1926
HONG Fu-zhong. A Study of Argument with Lawsuit to International Court of Justice between China and Belgium Revision Treaties in 1926[J]. Journal of Yulin Teachers College, 2007, 28(1): 56-59
Authors:HONG Fu-zhong
Affiliation:Lecturer,Chongqing Technology and Business University College of finance, Chongqing 400067
Abstract:Looking from the course of lawsuit to International Court of Justice between China and Belgilum revision treaties,Belgium took it for a means to force Peking Government to yield.In the conflict cause,Peking Government didn't rigidly adhere to concert explanation about individual provision,which was advantageous to lunch further in revision treaties diplomacy; after carefully defining the conflict nature,Peking Government had a wise choice not to lawsuit to International Court of Justice at that time.Joining international organization for Peking Government was helpful to promote Chinese international standing,which also provided a stage for China demonstrating oneself.
Keywords:Revision Treaties between China and Belgium   International Court of Justice   Lawsuit
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号