Let
(mathfrak {g}) be a simple complex Lie algebra and let
(mathfrak {t} subset mathfrak {g}) be a toral subalgebra of
(mathfrak {g}). As a
(mathfrak {t})-module
(mathfrak {g}) decomposes as
$$mathfrak{g} = mathfrak{s} oplus left( oplus_{nu in mathcal{R}}~ mathfrak{g}^{nu}right)$$
where
(mathfrak {s} subset mathfrak {g}) is the reductive part of a parabolic subalgebra of
(mathfrak {g}) and
(mathcal {R}) is the Kostant root system associated to
(mathfrak {t}). When
(mathfrak {t}) is a Cartan subalgebra of
(mathfrak {g}) the decomposition above is nothing but the root decomposition of
(mathfrak {g}) with respect to
(mathfrak {t}); in general the properties of
(mathcal {R}) resemble the properties of usual root systems. In this note we study the following problem: “Given a subset
(mathcal {S} subset mathcal {R}), is there a parabolic subalgebra
(mathfrak {p}) of
(mathfrak {g}) containing
(mathcal {M} = oplus _{nu in mathcal {S}} mathfrak {g}^{nu }) and whose reductive part equals
(mathfrak {s})?”. Our main results is that, for a classical simple Lie algebra
(mathfrak {g}) and a saturated
(mathcal {S} subset mathcal {R}), the condition
((text {Sym}^{cdot }(mathcal {M}))^{mathfrak {s}} = mathbb {C}) is necessary and sufficient for the existence of such a
(mathfrak {p}). In contrast, we show that this statement is no longer true for the exceptional Lie algebras F
4,E
6,E
7, and E
8. Finally, we discuss the problem in the case when
(mathcal {S}) is not saturated.