我国未来电信监管模式的新探索

电信产业的快速发展和电信技术的不断创新给电信监管带来了巨大的挑战。为此,本文从分析电信业发展的趋势和由此对电信监管带来的挑战入手,在对国外电信监管模式和技术手段进行充分实证分析的基础上,从政策法律、市场准入、互连互通、资费管制、普遍服务、电信标准等六个方面探讨了我国未来电信监管模式的发展方向和发展趋势。     

运动生化实验室建设和改革的实践与思考

本文浅谈了我院运动生化实验室建设和改革的一些实践经验,并提出了今后的发展设想。     

高校图书馆为东北老工业基地振兴服务的有效途径

论述了高等学校图书馆在振兴东北等老工业基地的背景下，可以利用自身的优势，通过为大型企业、中小型企业、各级领导、教师和大学生等提供知识服务，履行自己的社会职责。     

层次分析法在选择咨询服务中的应用

以国际咨询工程师联合会(FIDIC)推荐的根据质量选择咨询服务的思想为基础,结合中国的实际情况,建立层次分析法的模型,用来对选择咨询服务公司进行合理的决策.这将促进中国的咨询服务进一步与国际接轨.     

宁波港船舶交通管理系统(VTS)

通过对宁波港的交通环境，现有VTS系统及港口发展的趋势研究，提出了改善宁波港通航环境，建立和完善VTS系统的有效措施。     

千兆以太网在高速公路综合业务数字网的应用

文章通过介绍、分析现有高速公路通信综合业务数字网以及基于SDH的千兆以太网的网络结构及特点，提出基于SDH的千兆以太网在高速公路通信系统中的应用。     

知识挖掘在电信业客户关系管理中的应用

介绍了基于知识挖掘的电信业客户关系管理,分别从潜在用户、业务流程、客户行为角度探讨了知识挖掘在客户关系管理中的应用。     

A goal programming approach to strategic resource allocation in acute care hospitals

This paper describes a methodology for allocating resources in hospitals. The methodology uses two linear goal-programming models. One model sets case mix and volume for physicians, while holding service costs fixed; the other translates case mix decisions into a commensurate set of practice changes for physicians. The models allow decision makers to set case mix and case costs in such a way that the institution is able to break even, while preserving physician income and minimizing disturbance to practice. The models also permit investigation of trade-offs between case mix and physician practice parameters. Results are presented from a decision-making scenario facing the surgical division of Toronto's Mount Sinai Hospital after the announcement of a 3-year, 18% reduction in funding.     

基于三阶段SBM模型的中国节能服务上市企业效率研究

节能服务企业效率对于推动节能服务产业发展和确保国家“双碳”目标实现具有重要意义。运用三阶段SBM模型,对2020年60家中国节能服务上市企业的综合效率进行实证研究,并分析效率的影响因素。研究结果表明,经济发展水平对综合效率具有双重影响,合适的产业结构和较高的投入资本回报率有利于综合效率提升,而政府补贴与企业存续时间制约了综合效率改进;剔除环境因素与随机误差影响后,多数企业综合效率下降,整体效率偏低;提高规模效率是提升综合效率的关键,且绝大部分企业处于规模收益递增状态。研究最后提出创新补贴方式、建立企业认证制度、开展综合能源服务和推动企业间兼并重组等可行建议,以提升节能服务企业的综合效率。     

Is it safe to have a laboratory test?

A recent US Institute of Medicine report indicated that up to 98,000 deaths and more than 1 million injuries occur each year in the United States due to medical errors. These include diagnostic errors, such as an error or delay in diagnosis, failure to employ indicated tests and the use of outmoded tests. Laboratory tests provide up to 80% of the information used by physicians to make important medical decisions, therefore it is important to determine how often laboratory testing mistakes occur, whether they cause patient harm, where they are most likely to occur in the testing process, and how to prevent them from occurring. A review of the literature and a US Quality Institute Conference in 2003 indicates that errors in laboratory medicine occur most often in the pre-analytical and post-analytical steps in the testing process, but most of the quality improvement efforts focus on improving the analytical process. Measures must be developed and employed to reduce the potential for mistakes in laboratory medicine, including better indicators for the quality of laboratory service. Users of laboratory services must be linked with the laboratorys information system to assist them with decisions about test ordering, patient preparation, and test interpretation. Quality assessment efforts need to be expanded beyond external quality assessment programs to encompass the detection of non-analytical mistakes and improving communication between the users of and providers of laboratory services. The actual number of mistakes in laboratory testing is not fully recognized, because no widespread process is in place to either determine how often mistakes occur or to systematically eliminate sources of error. We also tend to focus on mistakes that result in adverse events, not the near misses that cause no observable harm. The users of laboratory services must become aware of where testing mistakes can occur and actively participate in designing processes to prevent mistakes. Most importantly, healthcare institutions need to adopt a culture of safety, which is implemented at all levels of the organization. This includes establishing closer links between providers of laboratory services and others in the healthcare delivery system. This was the theme of a 2003 Quality Institute Conference aimed at making the laboratory a key partner in patient safety. Plans to create a permanent public–private partnership, called the Institute for Quality in Laboratory Medicine, whose mission is to promote improvements in the use of laboratory tests and laboratory services are underway.Presented at the 9th Conference on Quality in the Spotlight, 18–19 March 2004, Antwerp, Belgium.