排序方式: 共有17条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
C. S. Unnikrishnan 《Foundations of Physics Letters》2000,13(2):197-200
An experiment proposed earlier by Karl Popper in his critique of the Copenhagen interpretation was realized recently by Kim and Shih. We show that the Copenhagen interpretation is consistent with the results, contrary to Popper's expectation. We examine the role of signal locality and momentum conservation in Popper's experiment and in the realization by Kim and Shih. 相似文献
3.
德国物理学家海森伯在1927年提出的不确定性原理,包括两力学量间的不确定性原理和能量与时间的不确定性原理,它的提出意味着量子力学不仅有了完整的数学形式,而且有了合理的理论解释.本文尝试通过对不确定性原理的创立背景、过程、应用等来对这一原理做简要介绍,特别强调了科学讨论在科学发展中的作用. 相似文献
4.
Jeremy Bernstein 《Physics in Perspective (PIP)》2008,10(3):269-286
I present a biographical profile of John S. Bell based upon extensive interviews I had with him. I present Bell‘s views on
the quantum theory along with a simple explanation of his identity.
Jeremy Bernstein is Professor Emeritus of Physics at the Stevens Institute of Technology
and a former staff writer for The New Yorker. 相似文献
5.
Timothy J. Hollowood 《Contemporary Physics》2016,57(3):289-308
In our quantum mechanics courses, measurement is usually taught in passing, as an ad-hoc procedure involving the ugly collapse of the wave function. No wonder we search for more satisfying alternatives to the Copenhagen interpretation. But this overlooks the fact that the approach fits very well with modern measurement theory with its notions of the conditioned state and quantum trajectory. In addition, what we know of as the Copenhagen interpretation is a later 1950s development and some of the earlier pioneers like Bohr did not talk of wave function collapse. In fact, if one takes these earlier ideas and mixes them with later insights of decoherence, a much more satisfying version of Copenhagen quantum mechanics emerges, one for which the collapse of the wave function is seen to be a harmless book keeping device. Along the way, we explain why chaotic systems lead to wave functions that spread out quickly on macroscopic scales implying that Schrödinger cat states are the norm rather than curiosities generated in physicists’ laboratories. We then describe how the conditioned state of a quantum system depends crucially on how the system is monitored illustrating this with the example of a decaying atom monitored with a time of arrival photon detector, leading to Bohr’s quantum jumps. On the other hand, other kinds of detection lead to much smoother behaviour, providing yet another example of complementarity. Finally we explain how classical behaviour emerges, including classical mechanics but also thermodynamics. 相似文献
6.
We clarify Bohrs interpretation of quantum mechanics by demonstrating the central role played by his thesis that quantum theory is a rational generalization of classical mechanics. This thesis is essential for an adequate understanding of his insistence on the indispensability of classical concepts, his account of how the quantum formalism gets its meaning, and his belief that hidden variable interpretations are impossible. 相似文献
7.
J P Vigier 《Pramana》1985,25(4):397-418
The differences between Einstein and Bohr on the interpretation of quantum mechanics revolved around the question of completeness
of the Copenhagen Interpretation. This fundamental problem is examined here in the light of recent neutron interference experiments
which allow for novel experimental situations. Exploiting the possibility of neutron spin flip in these experiments, the inadequacy
of the Copenhagen interpretation to fully understand the experimental results is brought out. Instead a causal interpretation
of quantum mechanics is advocated, in which the neutron, as a particle, does always have a definite space time trajectory
but also involves a wave which creates a potential affecting the particle neutron. The reestablishment of definite particle
trajectories in the microscopic domain obliges us to reexamine the statistical treatment of ‘identical’ particles, as well
as the problem of negative energies and probabilities in relativistic quantum mechanics. 相似文献
8.
The mystery of whether or not Werner Heisenberg gave Niels Bohr a drawing that Bohr came to
believe was that of a German nuclear weapon, is discussed and resolved. 相似文献
9.
Jan-Åke Larsson 《Foundations of Physics Letters》2000,13(5):477-486
It is well-known in the physics community that the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics is very different from the Bohm interpretation. Usually, a local realistic model is thought to be even further from these two, as in its purest form it cannot even yield the probabilities from quantum mechanics by the Bell theorem. Nevertheless, by utilizing the efficiency loophole such a model can mimic the quantum probabilities, and more importantly, in this paper it is shown that it is possible to interpret this latter kind of local realistic model such that it contains elements of reality as found in the Bohm interpretation, while retaining the complementarity present in the Copenhagen interpretation. 相似文献
10.
Yu Shi 《Annalen der Physik》2000,9(8):637-648
The famous gedanken experiments of quantum mechanics have played crucial roles in developing the Copenhagen interpretation. They are studied here from the perspective of standard quantum mechanics, with no ontological interpretation involved. Bohr's investigation of these gedanken experiments, based on the uncertainty relation with his interpretation, was the origin of the Copenhagen interpretation and is still widely adopted, but is shown to be not consistent with the quantum mechanical view. We point out that in most of these gedanken experiments, entanglement plays a crucial role, while its buildup does not change the uncertainty of the concerned quantity in the way thought by Bohr. Especially, in the gamma ray microscope and recoiling double‐slit gedanken experiments, we expose the entanglement based on momentum exchange. It is shown that even in such cases, the loss of interference is only due to the entanglement with other degrees of freedom, while the uncertainty relation argument, which has not been questioned up to now, is not right. 相似文献