排序方式: 共有4条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
2.
The work deals with the numerical solution of incompressible turbulent flow in a channel with a backward-facing step having various inclination angles. Also, the inclination of upper wall is considered. The mathematical model is based on the Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes equations. The governing equations are closed by the explicit algebraic Reynolds stress (EARSM) model according to Wallin and Johansson or by linear eddy viscosity models (SST, TNT k–ω). The numerical solution is carried out by the implicit finite-volume method based on the artificial compressibility and by the finite-element method amd both approaches compared. The numerical simulations use as reference the experimental data by Makiola and Driver and Seegmiller in large aspect ratio channels. In these cases, the results are obtained by 2D and 3D simulations. Further narrow channel PIV experimental data are used as reference for 3D simulations. 相似文献
3.
The gridless smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method is now commonly used in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and appears to be promising in predicting complex free‐surface flows. However, increasing flow complexity requires appropriate approaches for taking account of turbulent effects, whereas some authors are still working without any turbulence closure in SPH. A review of recently developed turbulence models adapted to the SPH method is presented herein, from the simplistic point of view of a one‐equation model involving mixing length to more sophisticated (and thus realistic) models like explicit algebraic Reynolds stress models (EARSM) or large eddy simulation (LES). Each proposed model is tested and validated on the basis of schematic cases for which laboratory data, theoretical or numerical solutions are available in the general field of turbulent free‐surface incompressible flows (e.g. open‐channel flow and schematic dam break). They give satisfactory results, even though some progress should be made in the future in terms of free‐surface influence and wall conditions. Recommendations are given to SPH users to apply this method to the modelling of complex free‐surface turbulent flows. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 相似文献
4.
Large-eddy simulations (LES) still suffer from extremely large resources required for the resolution of the near-wall region,
especially for high-Re flows. That is the main motivation for setting up hybrid LES–RANS methods. Meanwhile a variety of different hybrid concepts
were proposed mostly relying on linear eddy-viscosity models. In the present study a hybrid approach based on an explicit
algebraic Reynolds stress model (EARSM) is suggested. The model is applied in the RANS mode with the aim of accounting for
the Reynolds stress anisotropy emerging especially in the near-wall region. For the implementation into a CFD code this anisotropy-resolving
closure can be formally expressed in terms of a non-linear eddy-viscosity model (NLEVM). Its extra computational effort is
small, still requiring solely the solution of one additional transport equation for the turbulent kinetic energy. In addition
to this EARSM approach, a linear eddy-viscosity model (LEVM) is used in order to verify and emphasize the advantages of the
non-linear model. In the present formulation the predefinition of RANS and LES regions is avoided and a gradual transition
between both methods is assured. A dynamic interface criterion is suggested which relies on the modeled turbulent kinetic
energy and the wall distance and thus automatically accounts for the characteristic properties of the flow. Furthermore, an
enhanced version guaranteeing a sharp interface is proposed. The interface behavior is thoroughly investigated and it is shown
how the method reacts on dynamic variations of the flow field. Both model variants, i.e. LEVM and EARSM, have been tested
on the basis of the standard plane channel flow and even more detailed on the flow over a periodic arrangement of hills using
fine and coarse grids. 相似文献
1