排序方式: 共有27条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Arroyo CG King BJ Bachmann KT Bazarko AO Bolton T Foudas C Lefmann WC Leung WC Mishra SR Oltman E Quintas PZ Rabinowitz SA Sciulli FJ Seligman WG Shaevitz MH Merritt FS Oreglia MJ Schumm BA Bernstein RH Borcherding F Fisk HE Lamm MJ Marsh W Merritt KW Schellman HM Yovanovitch DD Bodek A Budd HS de Barbaro P Sakumoto WK Kinnel T Sandler PH Smith WH 《Physical review letters》1994,72(22):3452-3455
2.
Lung A Stuart LM Bosted PE Andivahis L Alster J Arnold RG Chang CC Dietrich FS Dodge WR Gearhart R Gomez J Griffioen KA Hicks RS Hyde-Wright CE Keppel C Kuhn SE Lichtenstadt J Miskimen RA Peterson GA Petratos GG Rock SE Rokni SH Sakumoto WK Spengos M Swartz K Szalata Z Tao LH 《Physical review letters》1993,70(6):718-721
3.
Yang UK Adams T Alton A Arroyo CG Avvakumov S de Barbaro L de Barbaro P Bazarko AO Bernstein RH Bodek A Bolton T Brau J Buchholz D Budd H Bugel L Conrad J Drucker RB Fleming BT Formaggio JA Frey R Goldman J Goncharov M Harris DA Johnson RA Kim JH King BJ Kinnel T Koutsoliotas S Lamm MJ Marsh W Mason D McFarland KS McNulty C Mishra SR Naples D Nienaber P Romosan A Sakumoto WK Schellman H Sciulli FJ Seligman WG Shaevitz MH Smith WH Spentzouris P Stern EG Suwonjandee N Vaitaitis A Vakili M Yu J 《Physical review letters》2001,86(13):2742-2745
We report on the extraction of the structure functions F2 and DeltaxF(3) = xF(nu)(3)-xF(nu;)(3) from CCFR nu(mu)-Fe and nu;(mu)-Fe differential cross sections. The extraction is performed in a physics model-independent (PMI) way. This first measurement of DeltaxF(3), which is useful in testing models of heavy charm production, is higher than current theoretical predictions. The ratio of the F2 (PMI) values measured in nu(mu) and mu scattering is in agreement (within 5%) with the predictions of next-to-leading-order parton distribution functions using massive charm production schemes, thus resolving the long-standing discrepancy between the two sets of data. 相似文献
4.
Sarmiento M Mooney P Bishop JM Biswas N Cason NM Dauwe L Godfrey J Kenney VP Pemper R Rojek E Ruchti RC Shephard WD Edelstein RM Forsyth CP Gamarnik K Ginther G Kreymer AE Lipton R McQuade JM Potter DM Russ JS Spiegel L Johnson DE Buchholz D Cremaldi L Delchamps SW Mao HS Rosen JL Sakumoto W Schluter RA Sontz SB Winter C 《Physical review D: Particles and fields》1992,45(7):2244-2248
5.
Mishra SR Leung WC Arroyo C Bachmann KT Blair RE Foudas C King BJ Lefmann WC Oltman E Quintas PZ Rabinowitz SA Sciulli FJ Seligman WG Shaevitz MH Merritt FS Oreglia MJ Schumm BA Bernstein RH Borcherding F Fisk HE Lamm MJ Marsh W Merritt KW Schellman H Yovanovitch DD Bodek A Budd HS de Barbaro P Sakumoto WK Sandler PH Smith WH 《Physical review letters》1992,69(24):3499-3502
6.
Mishra SR Bachmann KT Bernstein RH Blair RE Foudas C Lefmann WC Leung WC Oltman E Quintas PZ Sciulli FJ Shaevitz MH Smith WH Merritt FS Oreglia MJ Schellman H Schumm BA Borcherding F Fisk HE Lamm MJ Marsh W Merritt KW Yovanovitch DD Bodek A Budd HS Sakumoto WK 《Physical review letters》1989,63(2):132-135
7.
A. Bodek A. van Dyne J. Y. Han W. Sakumoto A. Strelnikov 《The European Physical Journal C - Particles and Fields》2012,72(10):1-7
The quark condensate is calculated within the world-line effective-action formalism, by using for the Wilson loop an ansatz provided by the stochastic vacuum model. Starting with the relation between the quark and the gluon condensates in the heavy-quark limit, we diminish the current quark mass down to the value of the inverse vacuum correlation length, finding in this way a 64?% decrease in the absolute value of the quark condensate. In particular, we find that the conventional formula for the heavy-quark condensate cannot be applied to the c-quark, and that the corrections to this formula can reach 23?% even in the case of the b-quark. We also demonstrate that, for an exponential parametrization of the two-point correlation function of gluonic field strengths, the quark condensate does not depend on the non-confining non-perturbative interactions of the stochastic background Yang?CMills fields. 相似文献
8.
McFarland KS Naples D Arroyo CG Auchincloss P de Barbaro P Bazarko AO Bernstein RH Bodek A Bolton T Budd H Conrad J Drucker RB Harris DA Johnson RA Kim JH King BJ Kinnel T Koizumi G Koutsoliotas S Lamm MJ Lefmann WC Marsh W McNulty C Mishra SR Nienaber P Nussbaum M Oreglia MJ Perera L Quintas PZ Romosan A Sakumoto WK Schumm BA Sciulli FJ Seligman WG Shaevitz MH Smith WH Spentzouris P Steiner R Stern EG Vakili M Yang UK 《Physical review letters》1995,75(22):3993-3996
9.
Bosted PE Andivahis L Lung A Stuart LM Alster J Arnold RG Chang CC Dietrich FS Dodge W Gearhart R Gomez J Griffioen KA Hicks RS Hyde-Wright CE Keppel C Kuhn SE Lichtenstadt J Miskimen RA Peterson GA Petratos GG Rock SE Rokni S Sakumoto WK Spengos M Swartz K Szalata Z Tao LH 《Physical review letters》1992,68(26):3841-3844
10.